TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I will never buy from a professional reseller, don't like this type of business. I shop at H, even if I have to travel by plane, or H.com.
One can always buy from an H store if they (a) can find one within reasonable transportation distance, (b) H store has the specific desired item in stock and (c) the buyer can afford the H sticker price.One can always buy from an H store if they can, no question about it. If people buy from a reseller, then there must be a reason that they can't easily buy from a store at its original price. So the reseller fulfil that needs by charging extra. I don't see what's wrong with it.
Oh gawd. Smh.This is no doubt a service for many, true enough.
For many other people, though, the "service" actually removes something fun. Those people have only two choices:
Choice 1: Pay extra money, risk buying a fake, AND lose out on the fun of visiting the store, holding the new-season scarves up in the light to see which CW suits you best, seeing whether an Evelyne really suits you, making friends with a SA so maybe they bump you up on the B/K list, etc.
Choice 2: Don't pay the extra money, but risk the chance that the ones you want will be sold out before you can take a trip to the store, because they have been bought by people who didn't even want them.
All resellers of any kind would be right to remind me of a few things:
1. Tough luck. The handbag or scarf you missed is someone else's gain. It's a cruel world, baby.Yes, any one of you is correct to think all these things. And like I said, I don't lie awake at night worrying about it. I got 99 problems, and a reseller ain't one.
2. Scarves and handbags are not puppies. They don't care if they go to "good homes" or not, so why should you?
3. Waaaaah, cry me a river. So you can't buy the exact luxury good you want. You do realize $10K builds a well in Ethiopia, right? Maybe you should go spend your money on that and save some lives instead of buying a handbag.
But a person putting a jacked-up price on a new-season scarf they just bought will always be different to me from cashing in on that exotic vintage Kelly that someone brought to you because they trust the reselling business you worked so hard to build.
TL; DR again. Sorry for boring anyone who's bored.
I don't care for the practice. I personally think it's deplorable even though I realize everyone needs to make a buck somehow. Some professions just aren't as honorable others. The reason why I'm against it is because even though these are generally bona-fide and outed resellers (the SAs do know), they limit the already scarce commodity for others who chose to go to the boutique directly and obtain it themselves.This is a helpful summary, fairly and neutrally worded. Thank you.
Speaking of wording: I realize that I made a mistake when I named the thread. I see now why I keep having to say over and over that I have no problem with resellers in general or their making a profit.
I should have called the thread "How do you feel about THE PRACTICE of buying specifically for immediate resale" instead of "how do you feel about the people." I don't know the people, and I don't feel any way about them one way or another.
I asked the moderators to rename the thread so that it talks about "the practice" and not the people, but so far they have declined, so I have to live with my bad word choice. Tant pis for me!
In my Alaskan boutique, if it's a non-floor exotic by all means they need to approve it and analyze the customer profile in detail. If it's a non exotic or kelly, they generally adhere to the supposed quota but there's always exceptions.Maybe this goes on in some stores, who knows? But in my store, the SD must approve every birkin or kelly sale. I think it would be hard to carry on such a practice in those circumstances.
Yes and the SA themselves are alloted a particular quota towards such and such. So they have to choose wisely which customer gets what. I swear they got a secret database. Lol they know if you're local or visiting, what hotel you're at if the latter, what profession and where you live if the former.The way it's worked in my store is that they are told which customer wants to buy the bag and it is up to them to approve the sale. It's not a decision the SA can make on their own.
It's on a case by case basis, depending on the area you live. But generally money talks.Sorry I should have phrased that better. I meant as in what sort of criteria would somebody have to fill in order to be allowed to purchase the bag. Do they have to have had a purchase history? Look a certain way? Behave in a certain manner? Is it fair that somebody is judged to such an extent before being able to make a purchase for an item that they have the funds to buy? I'm not saying it is or it isn't fair.. I'm merely asking the question as it's something that does make me wonder. X
Oh gawd. Smh.
I don't care for the practice. I personally think it's deplorable even though I realize everyone needs to make a buck somehow. Some professions just aren't as honorable others. The reason why I'm against it is because even though these are generally bona-fide and outed resellers (the SAs do know), they limit the already scarce commodity for others who chose to go to the boutique directly and obtain it themselves.
In my Alaskan boutique, if it's a non-floor exotic by all means they need to approve it and analyze the customer profile in detail. If it's a non exotic or kelly, they generally adhere to the supposed quota but there's always exceptions.
Yes and the SA themselves are alloted a particular quota towards such and such. So they have to choose wisely which customer gets what. I swear they got a secret database. Lol they know if you're local or visiting, what hotel you're at if the latter, what profession and where you live if the former.
It's on a case by case basis, depending on the area you live. But generally money talks.
What is an Alaskan boutique? Why not just say in "my boutique?"
Lol Alaskan is an old tpf term that means the same thing.
This thread is very interesting, I do not have an issue with resellers. It a business and if the practice of buying new or used items to turn them around for a profit is legal. It is a practice that has been around since the concept of free market has been around.
I do have an issue with resellers (professional or casual) who are dishonest about the condition of their items or how they acquired them. I have encountered many instances where resellers have listed an item as NWT or NWOT at a HUGE premium and yet with a little research on social media revealed that they have worn them. Some even have price tags attached in their OOTD posts.
I don't think Hermes (or any other boutiques) can do anything about it other than tighten their return policy. Maybe this will discourage some resellers if they can't return unsold items for cash. Coach recently changed their return policy to discourage resellers from scooping multiple new releases and listing them elsewhere. Hopefully this will keep more items in the stores for people to buy them for their personal use.
Interesting about Coach changing their policy. What kind of return policy could discourage people from purchasing new releases for resale? I can't think of anything except requiring any returns to be within a time period too quick for an ebay auction, which seems unreasonable.
And yes, while there is disagreement on whether buying simply for resale is objectionable or not, I don't think anybody is okay with resellers being dishonest about the condition of an item. Sure, one person's "excellent" could be another person's "very good" or "good," but a product is either new and unworn or it isn't.
Indeed I started my H journey from reseller who taught me how to appreciate H. So no harm in trying reseller as long as u know (or feel) he or she is sincere and selling u a genuine product
I totally agreed with Mistikat!There have been several threads on resellers. Some PFers dislike them - a lot. Others don't care. I don't care. There are plenty of people, including members here, who buy and flip hard-to-find items for a healthy profit. If people want to do that and they have buyers, more power to them. It happens with every commodity in the world. Why should Hermes be different, and why should anyone be fussed about it? People have the right to choose from whom they will buy ... and if these resellers offend them, I guess they will buy elsewhere.