I'm just ruminating:
Crypto in general, Bit Coin FTX dived and NFTs fell too, most people are already bored or lost confidence IMO, all pyramid schemes crash, very very few people want to be end-users (hence why I think they're a pyramid scheme - even money launderers mist have got worried).
I don't think we should be surprised H won.
From what I can remember, music (also no tangible except on sound carriers) publishing/red. contracts usually state "throughout the Universe" and music can be written (notated) or recorded.
The only argument for NFTs to have been considered exempt in terms of trademarks, copyright and patents is that all separate territories have boundaries and there is no "throughout the Universe" equivalent for design (let me know if there is?)
Most design is now done digitally (CAD) and modelled 3D and therefore most new designs exist digitally before physically. Even a sketch (2D) which I'm sure was done of a Birkin, was not physical, but a representation of a bag, tangible only when 'bound' on paper. Therefore, initially designs are nearly always not in physical forms but digital/sketched. I know that Gucci had to submit sketches to Mod Brev. to register designs - not give in physical bags and presumably it's the same in most countries (when they operated singularly) and territories now.
The Metaverse is not outside Earth, and all territories (or entities contain within) are still bound by the laws that given. Slam, dunk.
This NFT was pretty shameless as it took a (copyright) design, built on shared recognition signifying high status plus using a family name 'Birkin' in tangent as part of its company name. There could be little doubt that this was a 'chancer's' way to make money from another's efforts and reputation.
Please debate, I'm happy to be educated further on all things Meta (and points of law)
Crypto in general, Bit Coin FTX dived and NFTs fell too, most people are already bored or lost confidence IMO, all pyramid schemes crash, very very few people want to be end-users (hence why I think they're a pyramid scheme - even money launderers mist have got worried).
I don't think we should be surprised H won.
From what I can remember, music (also no tangible except on sound carriers) publishing/red. contracts usually state "throughout the Universe" and music can be written (notated) or recorded.
In France, songs (publishing ) are copyrighted by submitted as (notated) melody and written lyrics.
The only argument for NFTs to have been considered exempt in terms of trademarks, copyright and patents is that all separate territories have boundaries and there is no "throughout the Universe" equivalent for design (let me know if there is?)
Most design is now done digitally (CAD) and modelled 3D and therefore most new designs exist digitally before physically. Even a sketch (2D) which I'm sure was done of a Birkin, was not physical, but a representation of a bag, tangible only when 'bound' on paper. Therefore, initially designs are nearly always not in physical forms but digital/sketched. I know that Gucci had to submit sketches to Mod Brev. to register designs - not give in physical bags and presumably it's the same in most countries (when they operated singularly) and territories now.
The Metaverse is not outside Earth, and all territories (or entities contain within) are still bound by the laws that given. Slam, dunk.
This NFT was pretty shameless as it took a (copyright) design, built on shared recognition signifying high status plus using a family name 'Birkin' in tangent as part of its company name. There could be little doubt that this was a 'chancer's' way to make money from another's efforts and reputation.
Please debate, I'm happy to be educated further on all things Meta (and points of law)
Told you!
