TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I like both watches. Out of the two watches on their own, I prefer the MK watch (mostly because I prefer a bracelet-style band rather than leather). But with the watch being worn alongside the Love bracelet, I think the Bulova looks best.
Majority vote seems to be bulova with the love. What do you guys think of the watches on their own (if I wear the watch on the opposite wrist)?
Bulova.
Bulova also has incredibly good quality (with the one exception being that their diamond quality is somewhat low for their main line), and their new Precisionist line is supposed to be excellent.
I find MK watches to be a bit too "costume jewelry" in a Swatch or Fossil kind of way, and less elegant/classy.
I would disagree here.
I have a Bulova watch. It had so many problems. After I fix them it worked good.
But the outside parts of the watch is not really worth the price.
The glass got scratched so badly I changed it in less that 6 months.
The sapphire stone from the crown got lost. I did not even noticed it until the crown itself started scratching me.
The gold metal from the braclet worn out in less than 6 months, the cost of replacement was 95 dollars, which I found amusing and ridiculously overpriced considering the cost of the watch itself.
I change the glass which does not have scratches now. I beg the man to polish the crown, I could not do anything with the bracelet because it is way too specific to this particular watch.
Now I just change the batteries.
My ex bought me this watch, they have diamonds and Bulova still sell them. He bought them in the store, not online, so the price was close to retail.
It was not worth the troubles and price. Sorry if I disappointed anyone here.
http://www.watchzworld.com/bulova-ladies-diamond-98r70.html