I love everything about this , except for the way the diamonds are set. It reminds me of David Yurman. The diamonds don't have any fire and look a bit dull in the settings. Of course I need to see in person as pics can be deceiving.
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I love everything about this , except for the way the diamonds are set. It reminds me of David Yurman. The diamonds don't have any fire and look a bit dull in the settings. Of course I need to see in person as pics can be deceiving.
I think it is supposed to be a midcentury aesthetic. I would say it is 40’s-60’s style. I get that it’s not for everyone; but I think that period has an enjoyable merging of over the top glamour and a bit of camp for fun.Unpopular opinion here but I think the designs look quite dated, like very 70’s—especially with that rope design. But I do think that vintage-y, ornate look is very in right now with the stylish set so I can see the appeal.
Which pieces did you get eventually?I think it is supposed to be a midcentury aesthetic. I would say it is 40’s-60’s style. I get that it’s not for everyone; but I think that period has an enjoyable merging of over the top glamour and a bit of camp for fun.
I actually did not get them. I absolutely love the rings, but I have small fingers and they are too large on me (go over the knuckle). Did you end up adding any of the pieces from this line?Which pieces did you get eventually?
I bought the necklace and earring last year and added ring recently. I regretted I didn’t get the bracelet instead of earringI actually did not get them. I absolutely love the rings, but I have small fingers and they are too large on me (go over the knuckle). Did you end up adding any of the pieces from this line?