Favorite Chanel YouTubers?

[Swanky]

Friendly reminder to stay on topic. If you’re not discussing CHANEL you tubers then you’re off topic.
Also, we do not allow your drama off tPF to be brought here, do not bring drama here.
Please stay on topic and respectful.

 

[earthygirl]

I love their live shows, but it rubbed me the wrong way…more than 10 Euros per month??? That is near the Netflix price and I am sorry, but the content is not comparable! You also have to book the pricier subscription otherwise you still can’t watch the videos..again, like them a lot, but it left a bad taste in my mouth…

I think they want to quit their day jobs! Not on my dime!

 

[breakfastatcartier]

Any one interested in watching membership only videos by fashionablyamy and katl

There were many youtubers who started out making lux bag videos as a hobby … now their little “YouTube fame” has gotten to their heads.

Youtubers that give away garbage like boxes, wrapping paper, ribbons to their subscribers, pushing basic senreve bags in our faces while having ecstatic moments revealing Dior, Chanel, Hermès bags bought from that “senreve” money when their peasant subscribers use the link provided to buy those awful bag, reselling hot bags they’ve hogged for a premium…

I’ve learned to just watch these youtubers videos and not hype them up too much because a lot of them see their viewers and subscribers as dollar bills.

 

[Mumoflachie]

Cassie is hands down hilarious and I love her vids! I also enjoy Sophie Shohet's channel and I find her a bit more relatable than some others. Both not exclusively Chanel but they do feature the brand time to time. I've recently subscribed to Super Dacob and find his vids on the brand quite informative and interesting as well.

 

[Taty]

...deleted

 

[Plus Sized Luxury]

Really unique collection!

 

[pasdedeux1]

My personal opinion: Super Dacob wishes he was Haute le Mode but without the personality or fashion chops.

every video is a reaction video where he criticizes someone else’s content as if he has any ground to stand on about any of it. Presents the image that he’s a Chanel VIP by buying perfume with clickbaity titles.

over it. There’s nothing original about it and the ego required for someone with 5k Instagram followers to be flogging his own t shirts is just amusing.

 

[torontosarah]

He has a pretty extensive knowledge on fashion, history and Chanel in particular which I found enjoyable and interesting to watch from time to time. But I agree, his reaction and drama videos made me unsubscribe last month. I wish he would mix in more of his unconventional and educational content as he used to.

I also agree - his older videos are more educational and feel more genuine. I don’t mind some shade but the constant reaction videos to other peoples content feel contrived and arrogant. It’s too bad because I think he has a real wealth of knowledge. After his reaction to Purse on fleek his reaction video content went way up and it’s not good.

 

[pasdedeux1]

I also agree - his older videos are more educational and feel more genuine. I don’t mind some shade but the constant reaction videos to other peoples content feel contrived and arrogant. It’s too bad because I think he has a real wealth of knowledge. After his reaction to Purse on fleek his reaction video content went way up and it’s not good.

Arrogant is the right word. Condescending might be another. While I agree with some of his points about purseonfleek’s situation, I don’t think a 1-hour investigative report with props and the four subsequent videos about how he would just never deign to buy Hermès, it’s so beneath him, is just boring.

but he’s figured out that reacting to more popular people gets the algorithm to feed his content to their followers. It’s lazy.

 

[am1ly]

Any one interested in watching membership only videos by fashionablyamy and katl

I was a fan of them and loved watching all of their videos, especially the live talks. But now I'm disappointed with the membership subscription. This causes changes in my perception of the person.

 

[Antigone]

Any one interested in watching membership only videos by fashionablyamy and katl

I was so surprised when I saw this. I didn't know they're that big to charge membership.

 

[Emily1830]

I was a fan of them and loved watching all of their videos, especially the live talks. But now I'm disappointed with the membership subscription. This causes changes in my perception of the person.

Agree. And not sure what “perks” you’re supposed to get.

 

[CrazyCool01]

Agree. And not sure what “perks” you’re supposed to get.

Oh that would be - loyalty badges, member shout outs and emojis to use for questions or comments

 

[pinkorchid20]

Oh that would be - loyalty badges, member shout outs and emojis to use for questions or comments

I thought the perks would include the possibility to finance their Hermès journey…but sarcasm aside, I enjoyed both over the past years (to a certain extent as I was never able to fully identify with their style, preferences or approach to luxury consumption) but the decision to offer memberships just threw me off completely given there is not enough added value they offer for me personally that would justify charging for it. Kat just announced she would do a Chanel reveal for members only, the public unboxing would happen later. I wasn’t aware an unboxing was such a big deal. Why would I need to see a Chanel purchase before others could? Maybe I am just missing an important element here and I still want to give them the benefit of the doubt as I like their personalities, but just feel like this is an attempt of finding an additional income source (which is fine, but then just be transparent).

 

[LoredanaLidia]

I thought the perks would include the possibility to finance their Hermès journey…but sarcasm aside, I enjoyed both over the past years (to a certain extent as I was never able to fully identify with their style, preferences or approach to luxury consumption) but the decision to offer memberships just threw me off completely given there is not enough added value they offer for me personally that would justify charging for it. Kat just announced she would do a Chanel reveal for members only, the public unboxing would happen later. I wasn’t aware an unboxing was such a big deal. Why would I need to see a Chanel purchase before others could? Maybe I am just missing an important element here and I still want to give them the benefit of the doubt as I like their personalities, but just feel like this is an attempt of finding an additional income source (which is fine, but then just be transparent).

Totally agree!!! They charge more (if you get the whole membership on both channels) than Netflix.. hm…sorry..nope. I actually like Super Dacob a lot! Yes, he might not be everybody’s cup of tea, but I have the feeling that he is honest, respects fashion and its history and analyses questionable behavior in the YouTube and Lux-world…

 

[MissyBeautie]

I thought the perks would include the possibility to finance their Hermès journey…but sarcasm aside, I enjoyed both over the past years (to a certain extent as I was never able to fully identify with their style, preferences or approach to luxury consumption) but the decision to offer memberships just threw me off completely given there is not enough added value they offer for me personally that would justify charging for it. Kat just announced she would do a Chanel reveal for members only, the public unboxing would happen later. I wasn’t aware an unboxing was such a big deal. Why would I need to see a Chanel purchase before others could? Maybe I am just missing an important element here and I still want to give them the benefit of the doubt as I like their personalities, but just feel like this is an attempt of finding an additional income source (which is fine, but then just be transparent).

They are basically asking us to help fund their Chanel/Hermès purchases. Lol