I love it, but agree a thicker band would be better. Maybe slightly thinner than your eternity band.
ENGAGEMENT RINGS! What does yours look like?
- Thread starter Swanky
- Start date
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I recently restyled my 1.5 ct princess Center diamond. I also collect different shape diamonds (all purchased preloved) and wear as right hand rings. .50 emerald and 1 ct pear.
Last edited:
Hi! I love your stone. What is an OEC? Old-European Cut? Is that why the stone looks more flat and cushioned, but still round? I have been obsessed for a long time to figure out what this stone shape is, because I love how it’s more flat.
so gorgeous, both you and your ring! Congrats!
May I ask if your stone is a round brilliant or an Old-European cut? Thanks!
Just picked out my stone literally obsessed! For setting I’m thinking a plain thin WG band with a hidden halo - dainty and simple. Specs are 2.37 carat E color VS2 natural elongated cushion
He proposed when we were on vacation in Paris with this beautiful 3 stone design. I love it so so much!
1.32carat oval, G color, SI2
1.32carat oval, G color, SI2
Repost once set so we can see the actual ring!
A bit blurry but here’s the stone set!
Attachments
Congratulations on both the engagement and the magnificent ring.
Just right, imho
So pretty! I was interested to see which setting you would choose. I love a plain solitaire, but I also love side stones!
Hello my friend, not OP, but a collector of old cut stones. Yes, this is an Old European cut stone. Old European cuts are typically like the one in this photo; a small table, visible culet, more depth (so often appear smaller in face-up compared to MRB for the same carat weight, but also leads to unique and enjoyable light return compared to MRB). They have larger/different faceting compared to modern round brilliant cuts, so that they flash light like a “chunky” clearly-faceted cushion cut as compared to a “crushed ice/crushed glass” cushion cut.