Michael Kors Colette Messenger (Love at first sight)

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

#62
please, excuse my bad pic. But we make renovations, so I dont have a better place for pics. She is a beauty and I love her. Is not to big, not to small. Sure she is a medium purse with a large name.;) From comparison -> You will see the beauty Colette Zip NS LG peanut vs. HAmilton NS navy in the back and side by side and from top. Last the medium Hamilton E/W a little bit smaler side by side.
 

Attachments

  • colette1.jpg
    colette1.jpg
    37.7 KB · Views: 406
  • colette vs hamilton.jpg
    colette vs hamilton.jpg
    39.2 KB · Views: 381
  • colette vergleich hamilton.jpg
    colette vergleich hamilton.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 351
  • colette vs hamilton medium.jpg
    colette vs hamilton medium.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 369
#63
Rose71 said:
please, excuse my bad pic. But we make renovations, so I dont have a better place for pics. She is a beauty and I love her. Is not to big, not to small. Sure she is a medium purse with a large name.;) From comparison -> You will see the beauty Colette Zip NS LG peanut vs. HAmilton NS navy in the back and side by side and from top. Last the medium Hamilton E/W a little bit smaler side by side.
Click to expand...
Rose71, great pictures! So you got the medium Colette? Or is it the large Colette? It looks like it would be the same size as a large Selma. Your comparison to the n/s Hamilton tote and the e/w Hamilton help a lot. I also like how that peanut color looks on vitelo leather. Thank you. :smile1:
 
#64
Ubo 22, thank you:tup:Colette is the Large size (So on the etikett means LG - thats large, isn´t it?) That´s it, what I mean: She is a medium purse with a large name...(Or better title, designation;)). I personally think, large Selma is bigger than the large colette. But i dont have a selma here (maybe later:graucho:) so I dont can take a comparison.

edit: I looked online from the size selma. She is ca.6 cm larger than the colette. Selma 34 cm large, high 25 - colette 28 cm large, 26 high. Sorry, I don´t know how it is in inch.
 
Last edited:
#65
Rose71 said:
please, excuse my bad pic. But we make renovations, so I dont have a better place for pics. She is a beauty and I love her. Is not to big, not to small. Sure she is a medium purse with a large name.;) From comparison -> You will see the beauty Colette Zip NS LG peanut vs. HAmilton NS navy in the back and side by side and from top. Last the medium Hamilton E/W a little bit smaler side by side.
Click to expand...

Lovely, congrats!
 
#66
Rose71 said:
Ubo 22, thank you:tup:Colette is the Large size (So on the etikett means LG - thats large, isn´t it?) That´s it, what I mean: She is a medium purse with a large name...(Or better title, designation;)). I personally think, large Selma is bigger than the large colette. But i dont have a selma here (maybe later:graucho:) so I dont can take a comparison.

edit: I looked online from the size selma. She is ca.6 cm larger than the colette. Selma 34 cm large, high 25 - colette 28 cm large, 26 high. Sorry, I don´t know how it is in inch.
Click to expand...

Great! So yours is the large Colette. That makes sense because it's almost as big as your n/s Hamilton tote. So the large Selma is wider (left to right by 6 cm or a little over 2 inches) but the large Colette is slightly taller (top to bottom by 1 cm). Thank you. :smile1:
 
#67
Rose71 said:
please, excuse my bad pic. But we make renovations, so I dont have a better place for pics. She is a beauty and I love her. Is not to big, not to small. Sure she is a medium purse with a large name.;) From comparison -> You will see the beauty Colette Zip NS LG peanut vs. HAmilton NS navy in the back and side by side and from top. Last the medium Hamilton E/W a little bit smaler side by side.
Click to expand...

Love it!!!! I agree that the Large Colette is the perfect "medium" sized bag.....:smile1:
 
#68
Rose71 said:
please, excuse my bad pic. But we make renovations, so I dont have a better place for pics. She is a beauty and I love her. Is not to big, not to small. Sure she is a medium purse with a large name.;) From comparison -> You will see the beauty Colette Zip NS LG peanut vs. HAmilton NS navy in the back and side by side and from top. Last the medium Hamilton E/W a little bit smaler side by side.
Click to expand...


Love it!!! Lovely color too. I can't wait to pick up my black large Colette on Thursday. I can also post a pic of it with my medium selma.
 
#70
ubo22 said:
Great! So yours is the large Colette. That makes sense because it's almost as big as your n/s Hamilton tote. So the large Selma is wider (left to right by 6 cm or a little over 2 inches) but the large Colette is slightly taller (top to bottom by 1 cm). Thank you. :smile1:
Click to expand...
The Hamilton N/S is more bigger and wider. Hamilton is a large Purse (for me;)), colette is smaller, its a medium. Hamilton n/s is 36 cm long, I think 16 cm wide and 28 or 30 high. But Hamilton n/s is heavy.
 
#72
Rose71 said:
The Hamilton N/S is more bigger and wider. Hamilton is a large Purse (for me;)), colette is smaller, its a medium. Hamilton n/s is 36 cm long, I think 16 cm wide and 28 or 30 high. But Hamilton n/s is heavy.
Click to expand...
Yes, the n/s Hamilton tote it taller (height), wider (length), thicker (depth), and heavier than the large Colette. Although, I think the n/s Hamilton's length and depth are the same as the large Selma. I use my Selmas as every day handbags and my n/s Hamiltons when I have extra things to carry. I've gotten used to the weight of the n/s Hamilton, so it's not extremely heavy to me anymore. :smile1:
 
#73
I must absolutely want a large colette in watemelon! :search:

Come on MK I want to see other colors in this style bag besides the standard colors!

In the meanwhile I will admire everyone else's pretty colette.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top