seller
This is interesting from the listing's description:
"Authenticity: All of our items are checked by our in house authenticator in order to guarantee our items are 100% authentic."
Although it was sold, I'm hoping that if removed, the buyer might question it and hopefully get a refund. (The ponytail scarf might be okay.)
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Coach-Women-039-s-Beige-Leather-Ergo-One-Strap-Medium-Shoulder-Bag-Purse-D6J-9219-/113252303939?hash=item1a5e5d0443:g:6K4AAOSwE1BbnWfL&nma=true&si=R1KZE2gbI7%2FqXEL4yI4b6utHkH8%3D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
Just to add a comment, since the photo showing the fake D6J-9219 serial number has been removed:
Style 9219 Ergo Small Zip wasn't even introduced until Fall 2002. The "6" in the D6J- serial prefix is the year code for 1996. Also the genuine D6J- serial prefix was ONLY used in clothing items such as leather coats and jackets, which were not made in the same plants as handbags.
Here's the Wayback for December 7, 2002 showing "NEW" in front of the style name:
http://web.archive.org/web/20021207...y_id=68&show_bc=1&base_index=0&sort_by_price=
The seller also had a link to one of those bogus "authenticity guides" in the listing, in which at least 80 percent of the information was wrong, Not just dates that were roughly 10 years off, but also
quoting only the two most common pre- and post-1994 creed wordings followed by this statement:
"You can be quite certain that a bag is inauthentic if you examine its creed and find either: 1) at least one misspelling or 2) at least one word or phrase inconsistent with either of the two versions of the creed above."
... which completely ignores the fact that even in just the years between 1990 and 2000, genuine bags from ALL these lines - Dakota, Sheridan, Madison, Neo, Sonoma, Berkeley, and Gramercy, plus any bags made of any type of fabric or Nubuc plus all of the 1996 US Olympic Games items plus many travel items plus one or two other styles I can't think of at the moment, ALL HAD CREEDS THAT BROKE THE "RULE" POSTED IN THAT USELESS AND DANGEROUS "GUIDE". And given the dozens of different leathers and fabrics used in newer bags made after 2000, there are probably dozens more different creed wordings.
And that's just over one 10-year period. THAT'S why the Salearea Guides that I researched and wrote for Salearea come down so hard on those bloody "
Coach authenticity guides", and probably why a lot of perfectly genuine Coach bags are reported to Ebay or returned to the seller as "fake". When self-anointed experts disguise BS as wisdom, that's what happens. The links to that guide in the Ebay listings seem to have been removed but the guide is still on the seller's website.
I'll say it again - no matter where they're posted or how many alleged "authenticators swear by them and claim they're accurate,
AT LEAST 95 PERCENT OF SO-CALLED COACH AUTHENTICITY GUIDES ARE NOT EVEN CLOSE TO BEING COMPETENTLY RESEARCHED, AND ARE FULL OF MISINFORMATION, HALF-TRUTHS, OUTDATED EXAMPLES, NONSENSICAL "RULES", OR JUST PLAIN LIES AND BS. DON'T EVER DEPEND ON THEM! And if you see a seller who claims to use them as their basis for authentication, I'd look for another seller.