COACH Hall of Shame - Post Coach fakes here!

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah that just looked really wrong to me. I think it is a cute idea, but that bag is a hot mess. How long ago did they have bags with those pockets? Would be cute to see, I guess I missed it :shucks:.

Several of the Denim Patchworks from 2006 had them:
 

Attachments

  • 10808_Ergo Pchwk Hobo 14x10.jpg
    10808_Ergo Pchwk Hobo 14x10.jpg
    53.9 KB · Views: 103
  • 10819_d1.jpg
    10819_d1.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 102
  • 10810_d1.jpg
    10810_d1.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 101
  • 10812_d1.jpg
    10812_d1.jpg
    35.8 KB · Views: 97
  • 10813_denim.JPG
    10813_denim.JPG
    20.8 KB · Views: 95
OH WOW! I like that Tote too bad you cant get it anymore!

Originally Posted by Hyacinth Several of the Denim Patchworks from 2006 had them:
Great pics! I may try to see if there is one of those totes on the Bay that is a cute bag!

Be sure to have them authenticated here before buying, there were a lot of fakes made in those styles. They did a Carly style too, 10814:
 

Attachments

  • 10814.jpg
    10814.jpg
    55.9 KB · Views: 100
Last edited:
http://nashville.craigslist.org/clo/1334040708.html

Seriously? Knockoff sellers say the darnest things...

why so cheap?
when the COACH factories/warehouse makes these products they go through a "test" to make sure their items meet requirment. Even the smallest mistakes do not pass. because of that they connot charge the standard price for coach products. thats how we as consumers are able to get our hands on these products for a cheap price.

:lolots::roflmfao::laugh:
 
I got one. They said they have analyzed authentic bag price and discovered the price are too high comparing with expenditures of the brandname company. Actually, the customers pay mostly for the name of the brand, not for the product. That's why they decided to procuce the same handbags as authentic ones and sell them for much lower price then orginals'.

http://www.precaged.org/c/23/Coach.html
 
I got one. They said they have analyzed authentic bag price and discovered the price are too high comparing with expenditures of the brandname company. Actually, the customers pay mostly for the name of the brand, not for the product. That's why they decided to procuce the same handbags as authentic ones and sell them for much lower price then orginals'.

http://www.precaged.org/c/23/Coach.html


Somehow, I don't think that explanation is going to hold up in court.

I found a discussion at Ebay's Shoes and Purses forum about Korean-made "super fakes"
http://forums.ebay.com/db2/topic/Shoes-Purses-And/Korean-Quotsuper-Fakesquot/520145394
and one of the posters found a legal notice on what had been the fakes-selling website MyPurseWorld.com - check it out, at least one fakes site owner is in for some SERIOUS financial hurt:
http://www.mypurseworld.com/?cPath=18

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Pursuant to a Judgment and Order of the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Florida, the owners of the website previously appearing at this web address were held to have been selling counterfeit merchandise through the site, including counterfeit Chanel and Louis Vuitton handbags.

For genuine Chanel and Louis Vuitton merchandise, please visit the official Chanel and Louis Vuitton websites at www.chanel.com and www.louisvuitton.com.




UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 09-CV-20634-UNGARO​
CHANEL, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
HARRY CATTON, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________/
DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon Plaintiffs, Chanel, Inc. ("Chanel") and Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A.’s ("Louis Vuitton") (collectively "Plaintiffs") Motion for Entry Default Final Judgment Against Defendant Koodley.com, filed June 5, 2009. (D.E. 27.)
THIS COURT has considered the Motion and the pertinent portions of the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court notes that the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendant Koodley.coom on May 26, 2009. (D.E. 22.)
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Motion (D.E. 27) is GRANTED IN PART. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Default entered by the Clerk of the Court against the Defendant in this matter is APPROVED AND RATIFIED. It is further,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs, Chanel, Inc., a New York corporation, with its principal place of business in the United States located at Nine West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019, and Louis Vuitton, S.A., a foreign business entity, with its principal place of business in Paris, France, and against Defendant Koodley.com, Inc. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) Chanel is awarded statutory damages against Defendant Koodley.com, Inc. in the amount of Nine Hundred Thirty-Six Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($936,000.00), for which let execution issue. Interest fromthe date this action was filed shall accrue at the legal rate. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) Louis Vuitton is awarded statutory damages against Defendant Koodley.com, Inc. in the amount of One Million Five Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($1,560,000.00), for which let execution issue. Interest from the date this action was filed shall accrue at the legal rate. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant Koodley.com and its respective officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and all persons in active concert and participation with it are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from:
(a) manufacturing or causing to be manufactured, importing, advertising, or promoting, distributing, selling or offering to sell counterfeit and infringing goods using the Chanel and Louis Vuitton Marks;
(b) using the Chanel and Louis Vuitton Marks in connection with the sale of any unauthorized goods;
(c) using any logo, and/or layout which may be calculated to falsely advertise the services or products of Stylediva.net, Swisswatchlive.com, X-bags.net, Mypurseworld.com, and/or any other website or business, as being sponsored by, authorized by, endorsed by, or in any way associated with Chanel and Louis Vuitton;
(d) falsely representing themselves as being connected with Chanel and Louis Vuitton, through sponsorship or association;
(e) engaging in any act which is likely to falsely cause members of the trade and/or of the purchasing public to believe any goods or services of Koodley.com., Stylediva.net, Swisswatchlive.com, X-bags.net, Mypurseworld.com, and/or any other website or business, are in any way endorsed by, approved by, and/or associated with Chanel and Louis Vuitton;
(f) using any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the Chanel and Louis Vuitton Marks in connection with the publicity, promotion, sale, or advertising of any goods sold by Koodley.com., Stylediva.net, Swisswatchlive.com, X-bags.net, Mypurseworld.com, and/or any other website or business, including, without limitation, handbags, wallets, luggage, tote bags, briefcases, attache cases, backpacks, cosmetic bags sold empty, sunglasses, bracelets, earrings, necklaces watches, key chains, belts, hats, scarves, and umbrellas;
(g) affixing, applying, annexing or using in connection with the sale of any goods, a false description or representation, including words or other symbols tending to falsely describe or represent goods by Koodley.com., Stylediva.net, Swisswatchlive.com, X-bags.net, Mypurseworld.com, and/or any other website or business, as being those of Chanel and Louis Vuitton, or in any way endorsed by Chanel and Louis Vuitton;
(h) offering such goods in commerce;
(I) otherwise unfairly competing with Chanel and Louis Vuitton;
(j) secreting, destroying, altering, removing, or otherwise dealing with the unauthorized products or any books or records which contain any information relating to the importing, manufacturing, producing, distributing, circulating, selling, marketing, offering for sale, advertising, promoting, renting or displaying of all unauthorized products which infringe the Chanel and Louis Vuitton Marks; and
(k) effecting assignments or transfers, forming new entities or associations or utilizing any other device for the purpose of circumventing or otherwise avoiding the prohibitions set forth above.
It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant Koodley.com, Inc., those in privy with it and those with notice of the injunction, including any Internet search engines, Web hosts, domain-names registrar and domain-name registries that are provided with notice of the injunction, shall be and are hereby restrained and enjoined from facilitating access to any or all websites through which Defendant Koodley.com, Inc. engages in the sale of counterfeit and infringing goods using Chanel Marks and Louis Vuitton Marks. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in order to give practical effect to the Permanent Injunction, the domain names Mypurseworld.com and Swisswatchlive.com are hereby ordered to be immediately transferred by the Defendant, its assignees and/or successors in interest or title, and the Registrar to Plaintiffs’ control. To the extent the current Registrar does not facilitate the transfer of the domain name to Plaintiffs’ control within 15 days of receipt of this judgment, the United States based Registry shall transfer the domain names to a United States based Registrar of Plaintiffs’ choosing, and that Registrar shall transfer the domain name to Plaintiffs. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court reserves jurisdiction to tax attorneys fees and costs upon motion presented by Plaintiffs.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 8th day of June, 2009.

______________________________
URSULA UNGARO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies provided: counsel of record


,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
(There are several links inside the notice to similar judgements in other courts that were placed on former fakes-selling websites. They all make interesting reading.) And it looks like Chanel is taking the lead in nailing these crooks right where it hurts.

Go get 'em, Judge Ungaro!!! :yahoo:

Nice to see that it was a female judge who ordered the smackdown. We should name her an honorary tPF member! :D
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top