TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Have you been following the posts? Everyone is comparing the increases to those of Chanel. And that comparison is extremely accurate.
I'd also like to know how you think Chanel is so much less exclusive than any other brand.
Phoebe is probably not responsible for the price increase , but i think that this BRAND IS VERY VERY DEPENDING BY ITS STYLIST(CELINE also canceled fall winter catwalk show because she is expecting a baby) , nobody considered CELINE 5 YEARS AGO , when PHOEBE still worked for CHLOEOK, I have to say that I don't think Phoebe is necessarily personally responsible for the prices. She probably isn't responsible for much beyond the designs and the visual image of the brand. Céline has a CEO and a board of executives, and it is owned by LVMH so it is beholden to whatever their business strategies might be. Given that LVMH also owns such brands as Fendi (which, as someone mentioned, is also experiencing price increases), Givenchy and of course Louis Vuitton, I think it's safe to say they've got plenty of experience with marketing, pricing and consumers, and they will do whatever they think is necessary to maximise profits for as long as possible. .
cuselover said:When did u get it? It is 2400 now
I am beginning to get really annoyed at all the price increases that are happening to premier designer bags. It is enabling an elitist culture, which I am very sure is the main goal, and these executives are of course not stopping because they know people will continue to buy the bags no matter how high the increases are. I would hate to walk around society circles where bags are status symbols. I love designer bags but I really do not like the extreme bag snobbery it enables.
When did u get it? It is 2400 now
iluvmybags said:What is with all these comparisons to Chanel?
To be honest, if I were a designer, I'd want to DISTANCE myself from Chanel and certainly wouldn't want my brand constantly compared to it.
Celine has been around since the 1940's -- it is not a young company. I don't understand all these comments about it not being deserving or having a right to the same prestige that Chanel has -- what the heck? Is Chanel the God of all handbags, or what? What makes Chanel any more prestigious than any one of the other luxury brands out there. IMO, Chanel is far less exclusive than it once was and as for prestige -- I don't think its that prestigious of a brand, certainly not any more. Being compared to Chanel is no longer the compliment it once was, in fact, I think some people might consider it an insult
As for the price increases, it's not going to stop the faithful customers. If they've discovered the brand and love it, they will continue to buy it, whether the price stays the same or goes up a couple hundred bucks more. The same people who complained about the price increase 3 month ago, from $1750 to $2k and swore they were "done" are still buying bags from the brand, some making multiple purchases at the new price. It's easy to be vocal about price increases & to complain about it, but when it comes down to it, it hasn't stopped most people from buying them. And there's more to Celine than the Luggage bag -- maybe there will be fewer Luggage bags bought/sold, but maybe there will be some other new style to take its place
imlvholic said:Hawaii Minis drummed leather.... $1500+ believe it or not!