Jimmy Choo Authenticate This JIMMY CHOO (No Shoes - go to Shoe Forum)

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

It should be an actual open pocket. If you are looking for an authentication, please post the pics required in post number 1 of this thread so I can take a look for you.
you did it already-you said -it is genuine to you-see posts 4791,4790,4789,4788,4787,4786-it' s the same bag-but it seems that it is not repaired or hand made. i dont know how it can be
 
Last edited:
you did it already-you said -it is genuine to you-see posts 4791,4790,4789,4788,4787,4786-it' s the same bag-but it seems that it is not repaired or hand made. i dont know how it can be

Hmmm...I still think the bag is authentic from the pics I see. I am wondering if this was a defect in this bag. It was called liquid patent and neither of my Maddys are from this line. I had to go check to make sure mine were true pockets and they are...why does the color look so much different in the inside pics?
 
colors are same-but may be some releases are with stitched bottom pockets. can you explain, how someone can repair the bag in such a way

Are you sure this is a Maddy? It looks more like the slightly larger Mahala. What are the measurements? Are you asking how to open the pocket? I have never used this pocket or any of the outside pockets on my Maddys. The zippers are so stiff and with all the interior pockets I never needed to. I think I would just leave it sewn shut.
 
Are you sure this is a Maddy? It looks more like the slightly larger Mahala. What are the measurements? Are you asking how to open the pocket? I have never used this pocket or any of the outside pockets on my Maddys. The zippers are so stiff and with all the interior pockets I never needed to. I think I would just leave it sewn shut.
height-8.6" and length from strap to strap 11". and except of stitched pocket it seems very genuine
 
lilikh - in my opinion, your bag looks authentic from the photos posted. This is all we have to go on. I cannot explain either why the bottom pocket is stitched. I have a few Maddy's and Mahalas, but they are from 2008 and earlier. You may want to contact a Jimmy Choo boutique to ask this question.
 
is this real? what is the name? and from which year? thanx a lot:)
 

Attachments

  • 17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 012.JPG
    17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 012.JPG
    118.4 KB · Views: 115
  • 17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 006.JPG
    17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 006.JPG
    116.8 KB · Views: 114
  • 17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 005.JPG
    17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 005.JPG
    119.4 KB · Views: 104
  • 17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 010.JPG
    17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 010.JPG
    115.7 KB · Views: 101
  • 17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 009.JPG
    17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 009.JPG
    117.1 KB · Views: 99
  • 17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 007.JPG
    17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 007.JPG
    115.6 KB · Views: 103
  • 17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 008.JPG
    17-11-15 camilla tøj 3 008.JPG
    122.1 KB · Views: 107
Hello Everyone!

I actually bought these pair of Jimmy Choos from Ebay for $150. They were a floor sample so it has some wear and tear on it, but they are nearly 800 bucks off retail price. The shoes dont appear to have been worn outside as the soles are still clean.

Item Name: Jimmy Choo Fayme
Listing number: -
Seller name or ID: -
Working Link: -
Comments:

I would put all this info up but I have already purchased the shoes! Wish I saw this forum sooner. Anyways I just want to make sure they are authentic, and I was curious if I would able to have the defective areas fixed by Jimmy Choo (with a fee of course). I am surprised that these areas are affected from just people trying on the shoes in store, and I'm wondering if should I keep the shoes.. It almost seems like the strap in the buckle can snap off cause its so frayed. The seller did not disclose that the buckles were in this condition... but at $150 (assuming they are authentic) should I even be complaining? lol
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4354 2.JPG
    IMG_4354 2.JPG
    1.6 MB · Views: 97
  • IMG_4355bb.jpg
    IMG_4355bb.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 95
  • IMG_4366 l.jpg
    IMG_4366 l.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 89
  • IMG_4368 p.jpg
    IMG_4368 p.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 88
  • IMG_4356.JPG
    IMG_4356.JPG
    1.2 MB · Views: 89
Can you please have a look at this JC Bree I just received. I am concerned for a few reasons. The only logos are the plate inside and middle front. There is no tag or hologram, no cards with this bag. The internal zip has no make under the head of the zip.

Seller name: memi_au2015
eBay item: 161908860220
Jimmy Choo Bree
Link: http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/161908860220?_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT

Thanks so much, if you need any other photos I am happy to take.

Joyce
 
Can you please have a look at this JC Bree I just received. I am concerned for a few reasons. The only logos are the plate inside and middle front. There is no tag or hologram, no cards with this bag. The internal zip has no make under the head of the zip.

Seller name: memi_au2015
eBay item: 161908860220
Jimmy Choo Bree
Link: http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/161908860220?_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT

Thanks so much, if you need any other photos I am happy to take.

Joyce

Yes, we do need extra pics as these are blurry when I try to enlarge. I need to see a clear close up of the lilac nameplate, a pic of the interior ribbon showing the edge of the ribbon at least. Most of my choo bags do not have anything under the head of the zips so not to worry about that. Is the choo name on the little tiny zip inside the bag? Is the choo name engraved into any of the hardware? Also this bag may not have the hologram tab. Most of the older Choos did not.
 
Top