Authenticate This CHLOÉ

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Hi, I highly recommend get paid authentication for a second opinion. It looks ok BUT i have no photos of other 2015 ones. Im questioning the emboss inside and on the front of bag. Also the way the date tag looks is a little wierd. Go to my signature and use Auth Dectective - they are well priced.
Thanks for your time @Roie55, i think i will do that.. I am thinking that the stiching under the brand name on front is slanted. Also, can i still entrupy it after repainting the black suade?
 
Thanks for your time @Roie55, i think i will do that.. I am thinking that the stiching under the brand name on front is slanted. Also, can i still entrupy it after repainting the black suade?
stitching is fine, that suede isnt dyed. Painting suede is the worst thing anyone could do, it would make the bag completely worthless.
I dont support entrupy like most of us on this site. Its not reliable.
 
Does anybody know the name of this bag (clutch):

1697432199579.png

I am not looking for authentication as much as Identification: years of production, range, collection etc.
Bought it off The Real Real in 2020. Totally fell in love with the interior lining which is the most butter leather in the world...
 
Does anybody know the name of this bag (clutch):

View attachment 5877482

I am not looking for authentication as much as Identification: years of production, range, collection etc.
Bought it off The Real Real in 2020. Totally fell in love with the interior lining which is the most butter leather in the world...
There will be a date tag inside - looks like they were around 2007-2008, no names as the early styles had no 'names' associated with them. they were known as beaded clutch, clutch, bracelet bag etc. maybe Stella McCartney started the naming of the bag styles. Its not something i'm across.
 
There will be a date tag inside - looks like they were around 2007-2008, no names as the early styles had no 'names' associated with them. they were known as beaded clutch, clutch, bracelet bag etc. maybe Stella McCartney started the naming of the bag styles. Its not something i'm across.
Here is the only tag inside.
The number is 02 07 56.
1956? That's a loooong time ago. I doubt the bag is that old. If it is, it is in an exceptionally well maintained condition...

IMG_9537.jpeg
 
Hi all, I recently purchased the small Chloe Marcie. I initially ordered it from Saks, but was able to price match it at Nordstrom so ended up ordering it from there as well. I'm planning to return the Saks purchase, but decided to compare them side by side and noticed some variation, including in the handles, the long strap and the dustbag. All of this is making me think that one of the bags isn't authentic. I've attached some pics, and let me know if there are any additional angles you may need. The one with the bigger dustbag, as well as the wider strap is from Saks.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2982.jpeg
    IMG_2982.jpeg
    143.5 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_2981.jpeg
    IMG_2981.jpeg
    126.5 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_2980.jpeg
    IMG_2980.jpeg
    164.4 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_2979.jpeg
    IMG_2979.jpeg
    138.6 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_2978.jpeg
    IMG_2978.jpeg
    202.9 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_2975.jpeg
    IMG_2975.jpeg
    307.3 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_2977.jpeg
    IMG_2977.jpeg
    212.5 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_2976.jpeg
    IMG_2976.jpeg
    249.3 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_2974.jpeg
    IMG_2974.jpeg
    113.5 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_2973.jpeg
    IMG_2973.jpeg
    158.9 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_2969.jpeg
    IMG_2969.jpeg
    281.1 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_2970.jpeg
    IMG_2970.jpeg
    265.2 KB · Views: 8
Hi all, I recently purchased the small Chloe Marcie. I initially ordered it from Saks, but was able to price match it at Nordstrom so ended up ordering it from there as well. I'm planning to return the Saks purchase, but decided to compare them side by side and noticed some variation, including in the handles, the long strap and the dustbag. All of this is making me think that one of the bags isn't authentic. I've attached some pics, and let me know if there are any additional angles you may need. The one with the bigger dustbag, as well as the wider strap is from Saks.
And there was some residue (?) on the Nordstrom one
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2984.jpeg
    IMG_2984.jpeg
    196.6 KB · Views: 8
Hi, two Mini Marcies on Vestiaire site. Any red flags, maybe more pictures needed? (beautiful army green never seen before). Thank you!



 
Hi all, I recently purchased the small Chloe Marcie. I initially ordered it from Saks, but was able to price match it at Nordstrom so ended up ordering it from there as well. I'm planning to return the Saks purchase, but decided to compare them side by side and noticed some variation, including in the handles, the long strap and the dustbag. All of this is making me think that one of the bags isn't authentic. I've attached some pics, and let me know if there are any additional angles you may need. The one with the bigger dustbag, as well as the wider strap is from Saks.
Please reattach photos bag 1 separate to bag 2 also the date tags are missing, look inside pockets. Thanks
 
Thanks, below is the bag from Saks
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3003.jpeg
    IMG_3003.jpeg
    195.5 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_3002.jpeg
    IMG_3002.jpeg
    197.7 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_3001.jpeg
    IMG_3001.jpeg
    102.9 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_2998.jpeg
    IMG_2998.jpeg
    177.7 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_2997.jpeg
    IMG_2997.jpeg
    253.1 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_2996.jpeg
    IMG_2996.jpeg
    122.6 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_2995.jpeg
    IMG_2995.jpeg
    289.6 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_2973.jpeg
    IMG_2973.jpeg
    158.9 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_2972.jpeg
    IMG_2972.jpeg
    190 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_2971.jpeg
    IMG_2971.jpeg
    211.5 KB · Views: 6

Attachments

  • IMG_2987.jpeg
    IMG_2987.jpeg
    290 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_2988.jpeg
    IMG_2988.jpeg
    116.3 KB · Views: 2
  • IMG_2989.jpeg
    IMG_2989.jpeg
    122.4 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_2992.jpeg
    IMG_2992.jpeg
    174 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_2993.jpeg
    IMG_2993.jpeg
    250.4 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_2994.jpeg
    IMG_2994.jpeg
    211.7 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_2984.jpeg
    IMG_2984.jpeg
    196.6 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_2975.jpeg
    IMG_2975.jpeg
    307.3 KB · Views: 3
Top