Authenticate This Balenciaga

[Vlad]

IMPORTANT READ-ME

Please see post #1 for complete Balenciaga authentication rules. All requests must be posted in this thread. Authentications are not done via private message or in any other thread.

See the link below for examples of the photos needed and the format they should be in (clear, close up, forward-facing, no angles, right way up, no bends in tags).

https://forum.purseblog.com/threads/required-pics-for-balenciaga-authentication.741442/

A link to the listing in question is required.

It is an authenticator’s right to ignore a request that is not in the proper format. If the listing you are interested in is missing photos it is your responsibility to request them from the seller prior to posting in this thread.

Thanks and be well!

 

[ksuromax]

Hello! Please authenticate bag from this store

Name: Balenciaga Classic Velo Bag Orange

Seller ID: Atticvintage

Link: https://atticvintage.it/collections/handbags/products/balenciaga-orange-velo-crossbody-bag


Code seems sorbet not orange and font looks wrong to me

Thank you ☺️

pictures don't open full size, i can't read anything clear enough to tell firmly. besides, bale picture is missing.

 

[ksuromax]

ah, wait, it opens in the main photo
well, again - bale is missing, as well as rivets, but all the rest looks very promising.

 

[Just Violet]

ah, wait, it opens in the main photo
well, again - bale is missing, as well as rivets, but all the rest looks very promising.

Hi 👋🏻 thanks for answering. But 5669 isn’t sorbet code? font’s number of the code looks so weird to me. the seller said he has authenticated it by Entrupy, which I know is not so valuable as service.

 

[muchstuff]

Hi 👋🏻 thanks for answering. But 5669 isn’t sorbet code? font’s number of the code looks so weird to me. the seller said he has authenticated it by Entrupy, which I know is not so valuable as service.

Yeah the colour code is wrong. @ksuromax , the font looks off to me as well.

 

[Just Violet]

Yeah the colour code is wrong. @ksuromax , the font looks off to me as well.

Hi 👋🏻 thanks for answering. It looks that the code it’s also not deeply impressed on the leather. Number 7 and 2 especially looks wrong.

 

[muchstuff]

Hi 👋🏻 thanks for answering. It looks that the code it’s also not deeply impressed on the leather. Number 7 and 2 especially looks wrong.

Good that you checked!

 

[Just Violet]

Good that you checked!

Thanks. I had many B-bags through the last 16 years. This velò just looked weird to me 😅

 

[ksuromax]

Hi 👋🏻 thanks for answering. But 5669 isn’t sorbet code? font’s number of the code looks so weird to me. the seller said he has authenticated it by Entrupy, which I know is not so valuable as service.

good call actually, when in doubt - pass

 

[ksuromax]

Yeah the colour code is wrong. @ksuromax , the font looks off to me as well.

Bal had so many weird fonts over the years, that you can never be 100% sure going with just the font alone, but without bale and rivets i would not give any bag green light anyway

 

[muchstuff]

Bal had so many weird fonts over the years, that you can never be 100% sure going with just the font alone, but without bale and rivets i would not give any bag green light anyway

Yeah I'd be very curious to see those details!

 

[ksuromax]

Yeah I'd be very curious to see those details!

most probably they are not provided for a reason

 

[muchstuff]

most probably they are not provided for a reason

Nah, if that was the case they wouldn't have shown the tag at all!

 

[ksuromax]

Nah, if that was the case they wouldn't have shown the tag at all!

who knows?

 

[marcella_paiva]

Hello. I found a balenciaga city in a thrift store in Vancouver, Canada. I don’t have a Link of the bag but will send the info below:
N 12603 J
115748

 

[marcella_paiva]

Hello. I found a balenciaga city in a thrift store in Vancouver, Canada. I don’t have a Link of the bag but will send the info below:
N 12603 J
115748

Is this authentic??