Authenticate This Balenciaga

[Vlad]

IMPORTANT READ-ME

Please see post #1 for complete Balenciaga authentication rules. All requests must be posted in this thread. Authentications are not done via private message or in any other thread.

See the link below for examples of the photos needed and the format they should be in (clear, close up, forward-facing, no angles, right way up, no bends in tags).

https://forum.purseblog.com/threads/required-pics-for-balenciaga-authentication.741442/

A link to the listing in question is required.

It is an authenticator’s right to ignore a request that is not in the proper format. If the listing you are interested in is missing photos it is your responsibility to request them from the seller prior to posting in this thread.

Thanks and be well!

 

[ksuromax]

Thanks a lot i'm trying to get more pictures but it sounds complicate.

The thing is that the seller saying that it's a Velo, and number on his pictures it seems to be a Velo too but when I see the pictures of the seller and the the common pictures of a Balenciaga Velo the Velo model seems to be différent.
Sorry for my bad English

your English is fine
but we really need all the pictures
it could be just the angle of the picture, if the style number is for Velo, and the Seller says it's Velo, then, probably it is indeed a Velo
just captured a bit crammed

 

[Morganecamille]

Hi everyone,

I would love to have an opinion regarding the authenticity of this bag. I haven’t bought it yet as I wanted to be sure before. I just requested more pics to the seller.

- City Small 115748 - 502752
- color ? The seller say « Mint » but it seems more yellow... perhaps the «Granny» from SS09 ?

Thank you in advance for your help!

 

[muchstuff]

Hi everyone,

I would love to have an opinion regarding the authenticity of this bag. I haven’t bought it yet as I wanted to be sure before. I just requested more pics to the seller.

- City Small 115748 - 502752
- color ? The seller say « Mint » but it seems more yellow... perhaps the «Granny» from SS09 ?

Thank you in advance for your help!

View attachment 4732895View attachment 4732896View attachment 4732897View attachment 4732898

Welcome to TPF! Firstly it's a regular City not a small. Impossible to tell the colour as no two pics look the same but it's prior to 2011. Please see the post at the top of the page for a link showing the photos needed and the way they should be presented, forward facing, no angles, close up, clear.

 

[Morganecamille]

Welcome to TPF! Firstly it's a regular City not a small. Impossible to tell the colour as no two pics look the same but it's prior to 2011. Please see the post at the top of the page for a link showing the photos needed and the way they should be presented, forward facing, no angles, close up, clear.

Thank you for your quick reply! I’ll wait to receive more pics from the seller, thanks again

 

[muchstuff]

Thank you for your quick reply! I’ll wait to receive more pics from the seller, thanks again

Please show her examples of the pics needed so you get the best angles.

 

[*Jenn*]

Please help authenticate two different twiggys for me!

- green one has small spot showing , tag peeled back, no color? (Last pic of green)
- two different types of dust bag?

 

[*Jenn*]

photos of black twiggy

[/QUOTE]

 

[muchstuff]

Please help authenticate two different twiggys for me!

- green one has small spot showing , tag peeled back, no color? (Last pic of green)
- two different types of dust bag?




View attachment 4733154 View attachment 4733155 View attachment 4733156 View attachment 4733157 View attachment 4733158 View attachment 4733159 View attachment 4733160 View attachment 4733161 View attachment 4733162

Authentic in my opinion.

 

[muchstuff]

photos of black twiggy

View attachment 4733167 View attachment 4733168 View attachment 4733169 View attachment 4733170 View attachment 4733171 View attachment 4733172 View attachment 4733173 View attachment 4733174

[/QUOTE]
Authentic in my opinion.

 

[*Jenn*]

Authentic in my opinion.

i have never seen the small spot with no color. Is that not cause for concern?
(Last photo of green)

 

[muchstuff]

i have never seen the small spot with no color. Is that not cause for concern?
(Last photo of green)

Is it the bottom of the piece of leather where the buckle is? Or a scrape in the leather? The angle of the photo makes it hard to tell what you're looking at. At any rate the bag's authentic whether it's a flaw or whatever I can't say.

 

[Kailua]

Item: balenciaga small city bag
Seller: poshmark
Link: https://posh.mk/17TYKiANz6

thanks in advance for your help authenticating!! I can post more pics when I receive the bag as well.

 

[*Jenn*]

Is it the bottom of the piece of leather where the buckle is? Or a scrape in the leather? The angle of the photo makes it hard to tell what you're looking at. At any rate the bag's authentic whether it's a flaw or whatever I can't say.

It is the underside of the buckle patch

 

[muchstuff]

View attachment 4733184 View attachment 4733185 View attachment 4733186 View attachment 4733187 View attachment 4733188 View attachment 4733189 View attachment 4733190 View attachment 4733191 Item: balenciaga small city bag
Seller: poshmark
Link: https://posh.mk/17TYKiANz6

thanks in advance for your help authenticating!! I can post more pics when I receive the bag as well.

You're missing pics of the tag back, the rivet and the bale. Part of the strap appears not to be the original, that flat stud doesn't belong, I can't see enough of the rest to comment. It's not a City small, it's a regular size, from 2008 by the tag front. Please post all pics when you receive the bag and we'll take another look. Aside from the strap nothing seems out of place but I'd prefer to see all the photos needed.

 

[muchstuff]

It is the underside of the buckle patch

As mentioned I can't really comment on that, whether it's a flaw or damage the photo's not good enough to say. Bags weren't always perfect, that bag appears to be an apple green from 2005 and there were more anomalies back then.