Authenticate This Balenciaga

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi ladies, please authenticate this foam first for me. thank you in advance

b3lq1f.jpg

2vwe7h2.jpg

552f5f.jpg

970f43.jpg

Sorry. This one is fake! :tdown:
 
Last edited:
Those two photos look good. :yes: Of course you will need more photos to play it safe.

thanks you, melissab and handbagangel!
i asked her for pictures of the rivet and the bales, but the seller didn´t understand what i meant and sent me these instead:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v190/donutducki/IMG00202.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v190/donutducki/IMG00200.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v190/donutducki/IMG00199.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v190/donutducki/IMG00198.jpg
do these look correct?
she isn´t at home and can´t take any more pictures.
thanks a lot in advance
 
The tag doesn't match the bag. Please ask clear photos of its back side of the leather tag and rivets. If you could ask another close up photo and up front photo of its leather tag, that would be even better.

I have asked for more photos and I'm waiting.
But maybe its not antracite as the user writes, it could look like a 2007 Plomb?? Or am I wrong?
 
I have asked for more photos and I'm waiting.
But maybe its not antracite as the user writes, it could look like a 2007 Plomb?? Or am I wrong?

As matter of the fact, I only looked at its photos, didn't read its description so I defined it is Plomb. :sweatdrop: :p Anthracite should have some blue tone in the dark gray but this one looks Plomb to me totally. Sometimes the lighting may change the color effect, but none of the photo shows the blue tone? :confused1: Overall it looks good, but we have seen some very good GH fake around, so please ask photos of its rivets and back side of the inner tag.
 
thanks you, melissab and handbagangel!
i asked her for pictures of the rivet and the bales, but the seller didn´t understand what i meant and sent me these instead:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v190/donutducki/IMG00202.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v190/donutducki/IMG00200.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v190/donutducki/IMG00199.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v190/donutducki/IMG00198.jpg
do these look correct?
she isn´t at home and can´t take any more pictures.
thanks a lot in advance

Those four photos didn't help much, but I could barely see its bale, and it looks good. Together with the previous two photos (post #3004), I'd say this City is authentic. :yes: Good luck!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top