If it were me I probably would not purchase as I feel they are too similar. Unless you totally love them then I say why not? Many people have multiple monogram bags (especially lv).
The 1955 Horsebit is by only monogram bag. I'm not opposed to adding a second (but would probably draw the line there) as long as they serve a different purpose. I think that's the central question I need to figure out. They're very similar, but are the subtle differences in function enough to justify it?
IMO redundant. Sometimes we plan to buy things that are no longer needed in our current lives
But if you love it, want a similar bag that is a crossbody, and will use it, then why not.
This is such a good point. I've been eyeing this bag for years and have placed it in my cart more times than I can count. I was able to see it in person a few months ago, which confirmed my love for it, but I wasn't ready to purchase it for a few different reasons. Now that it's no longer available directly from
Gucci, I feel like it's now or never before it disappears from the other retail sites too. So, maybe there's a bit of FOMO playing a role too.
Exactly my thought. Personally, if I were going to get the second bag I would go for leather so there was not so much overlap with the first.
Oh, I wish I could find it in leather. Sadly, I think this one was very limited in leather versions even when it was readily available through Gucci. I can't for the life of me figure out why this style didn't catch on like the other dome-shaped Ophidia bag.
If one can be crossbody and the other not then it's not redundant to me!
Hahahaha!!! Finally the voice of an enabler that I've been craving! This is kind of what I'm thinking. I find that I don't use the 1955 Horsebit in situations when I need to carry it longer than quick errands hopping in and out of the car, dinners out, etc. If I'm going to be walking around for a bit, I prefer more of a crossbody. So, perhaps this will fill that need.
Thank you all! All good points around...