in terms of the line as a whole. and that's why LV is more popular? becuase it is, relatively speaking, more affordable?
LV has several lines in leather that are more expensive than the monogram. I'm a fan of the epi leather, and those are cheaper than Chanel (around $1000 depending on the style). However, lines like the Nomade are over $2000 for a bag and some of the Suhali bags are over $3000. Overall though, Chanel is probabaly more expensive.I think more expensive, but worth it. Chanel bags are made of leather, LV uses a coated canvas. I can't justify spending that much money on a non leather bag. But a lot of people love the mono canavas. To each their own.
Thank you! Aren't Shelties wonderful? My cousin converted me with Bear. He's so sweet it's almost silly. Kola (the blue) is a little terror and I love them both to death! Sorry to diverge from topic... :shame:Chanel is definitely more expensive, but like OnyxBear indicates, LV also has some really expensive bags (i.e. Nomade and Suhali).
OnyxBear - I love your dogs on your avatar. I used to have a Blue Merle Sheltie. He was the best dog ever.
Chanel is WAY more expensive..Hands down!
yes ! Agree with all of the posts abovewould you say overall, chanel handbags are more expensive than LV's?