which white "ceramic" watch do you like? pictures inside. I would love to know ur rea

[PlatinumSerenity]

which white "ceramic" watch do you like? pictures below. I would love to know ur reasons on which one looks better.



When I wear it, the watch # 1 is bigger on my small wrist. I have a small wrist so # 2 looks better on me. It's a tad bit smaller watch.

BUT... I like the crystals on the watch # 1.

BUt.... do you think # 1 is TOO Blingy and cheap looking and too gaudy?

What do you think? which one do you like better.

Helppppp...

 

[rainyjewels]

I absolutely love the first one. the crystals look sooo much better than the 2nd one. the 2nd one's crystals look a bit too cheap imo. why would you think the first one may look cheap and gaudy? i don't get that sense at all

 

[PlatinumSerenity]

i was thinking the crystals were gaudy on # 1 because there's more of it on the watch.

What do you think of watch # 1 being kinda big on my wrist. I have small wrist... so should I go with # 2?

 

[rainyjewels]

I think it kind of depends on what you want. I personally love oversized watches that look bold, so I like it even on a small wrist aka I like the first one better. If you like a more demure and feminine watch, and the second one being smaller, it's probably the better choice for you. Either way, go with your instinct! It seems like you like the second one better

 

[PlatinumSerenity]

truthfully, I like the crystals on #1, but i like the size on # 2... sigh..

 

[SweetCherries]

i was thinking the crystals were gaudy on # 1 because there's more of it on the watch.

What do you think of watch # 1 being kinda big on my wrist. I have small wrist... so should I go with # 2?

I agree with you and likes #2 better, a more subtle bling-bling look. Good luck.

 

[Fendi213]

Overall I like #2 better. You can't go wrong with a Michael Korrs.

 

[vhdos]

I guess I don't see a big difference in the "bling" factor. From what I can tell from the pictures, watch 1 has two rows of smaller crystals and watch 2 has one row of larger crystals. One doesn't look any more "gaudy" than the other. I would choose by size and not put so much emphasis on the crystals in this case.

 

[Phillyfan]

Does #2 have a mother of pearl face? If so, I prefer #2. Are these the $450 and $495 ceramic watches? I looked at the black one at Macys before I ordered my ceramic Tag.

 

[Kitsunegrl]

I prefer #2. The face of the watches already have a lot going on, so the single row of crystals enhances instead of fights with it.

#1 almost seems TOO busy and I think it is because of the double row of crystals.

 

[shanam]

I prefer #2. The face of the watches already have a lot going on, so the single row of crystals enhances instead of fights with it.

#1 almost seems TOO busy and I think it is because of the double row of crystals.

I have to agree, only because there are so many knock-offs of this style really cheap, that the one row looks more real if you get what I am saying.

 

[Deathly Sweet]

I prefer #1 as I'm not a big fan of MOP dials.

 

[Arachne911]

I have #2 and I love it. It gets lots of compliments too!

 

[Oceane]

#2 looks really nice!

 

[sbabyphat]

I like #2 better!