Which Tiffany embrace wedding band?

C

chialily

Member
Aug 19, 2008
25
94
#1
Hi
I have a engagement ring in Tiffany setting in 1.04 CT. Recently my hubby upgraded my non Tiffany wedding band to Tiffany embrace wedding band in 3.5 mm and .91 CT. (Picture 1). I’m worried it’s too big compared to my engagement ring. Should I choose 3mm and .54 CT instead? (Picture 2). I want big as possible but I can’t make my mind. Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • 1BEF36C5-D20C-4E59-985B-D958C41F3F37.jpeg
    1BEF36C5-D20C-4E59-985B-D958C41F3F37.jpeg
    182.5 KB · Views: 2,035
  • 01B14F2B-6F7D-4D41-8FCC-24B97EC316A3.png
    01B14F2B-6F7D-4D41-8FCC-24B97EC316A3.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 1,656
#7
If you always wear your rings together, the second combination looks nice. The size of the stones in the band complements the size of the solitaire.

If you occasionally wear the band alone, consider keeping the original Embrace band with the larger stones. Let us know what you end up deciding!
 
  • Like
Reactions: chialily
#9
I had the same dilemma and ended up pairing my Tiffany setting ring with the Tiffany Metro band — the smaller diamonds make the solitaire pop, I think. Have you thought about doing something like that & wearing the Embrace ring as a right hand ring because it’s so substantial on its own?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LilaLou05 and chialily
#11
I like both. They’re gorgeous rings! If you prefer one over the other, trust that instinct. I sized down my wedding band (2mm from 3mm) after getting advice that it wouldn’t compete with my engagement ring (1.25c).....and while that’s true, I do have a hint of regret not sticking with the original one I was drawn to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chialily and Lisa-SH
#12
Definitely the 2nd one if only between the two choices. Frankly I think even a thinner eternity-style band would look better. Not a fan of the mismatched/gap/space look on e-rings and bands worn stacked. If you prefer the wider band consider wearing on the right hand instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USCGirlie and chialily
#13
Thank you all! Appreciated all your suggestions and feedbacks.

Since I already have a non-Tiffany thin wedding band to wear with my e-ring, I will keep the first embrace ring (3.5 mm and 0.91 ct). This will allow me not to have to wear my e-ring all the time especially with two young kids. The new wedding band is substantial to wear it by itself. And I just can’t say no to more diamonds. I plan to wear my embrace ring on right hand when I do wear my e-ring.
 

Attachments

  • 64CA1991-582B-40C7-93B5-A788AB7F8394.jpeg
    64CA1991-582B-40C7-93B5-A788AB7F8394.jpeg
    168 KB · Views: 1,084
  • Like
Reactions: liliBuo, Shopgirl1996, JessicaRabbit1 and 6 others
#15
chialily said:
Thank you all! Appreciated all your suggestions and feedbacks.

Since I already have a non-Tiffany thin wedding band to wear with my e-ring, I will keep the first embrace ring (3.5 mm and 0.91 ct). This will allow me not to have to wear my e-ring all the time especially with two young kids. The new wedding band is substantial to wear it by itself. And I just can’t say no to more diamonds. I plan to wear my embrace ring on right hand when I do wear my e-ring.
Click to expand...

Sounds like a perfect solution!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top
Back