Which do you prefer: Caviar or Lambskin for a Kelly

  1. Sign up to become a TPF member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It's free and quick to sign up, so join the discussion right now!
    Dismiss Notice
Our PurseForum community is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker. Thank you!
  1. Please bear with me as this is my first Chanel bag, and I am beyond excited. I ordered the small black Chanel Kelly in lambskin because my SA said it will be more lush and even more beautiful in lambskin, especially since this is not going to be an everyday bag. Now, after reading this thread http://forum.purseblog.com/chanel/caviar-vs-lambskin-67724-2.html?highlight=lambskin+caviar , I am wondering whether I should get caviar instead.

    Which would you prefer, caviar or lambskin? Even though lambskin is not as durable as caviar, is it still worth it because it is so beautiful???

    Thank you everyone!!! :flowers:
  2. welocme Jag .. i vote for Caviaaar :heart:
  3. Jag, if you aren't planning on carrying her everyday, lamb will be fab.
    Lambskin isn't quite as delicate as it used to be and if you take even just pretty good care of it, it'll be fine.
    Caviar IS more durable, excellent for daily wear, but isn't nearly as soft or Luxe.
  4. I'm such a Chanel neophyte I can't really offer that informed of an opinion BUT I'm so excited for you, this is a really lovely bag!
  5. Stick with the lamb, because it's not a bag you'll use everyday. Caviar is nice, durable, but lamb is nicer!:yes:
  6. Thank you so much ladies! You are the best! I feel so much better now. And BagLovingMom, thank you-you are such a sweetheart! I am so excited, I cannot wait to pick her up (I might sneak over there tomorrow if I get a chance)!!!
  7. For the KELLY I would definitely get the lambskin! The bag is more luxurious looking in lambskin, and since it's not an everyday bag this is okay.