I just call them by babiesHmm I don't understand giving bags a pronoun...'she'. I really like all of my bags but I don't name them and I always find it funny when people refer to a handbag in the 3rd person.
I just call them by babiesHmm I don't understand giving bags a pronoun...'she'. I really like all of my bags but I don't name them and I always find it funny when people refer to a handbag in the 3rd person.
My wardrobe is very neutral...I generally wear black, navy, white and cream...so I love a pop of color. I love all my bright H silks and have a turquoise B that I carry often and a bambou bag is on my wishlist. I hold the opposite, and undoubtedly unpopular, opinion that etain and etoupe are terribly boring...not dissimilar to wearing khakis every day. Also don't understand the appeal of gold. To each their own however.My unpopular opinion (because I saw a lady today carrying one) is that I think bright almost neon colors cheapen Hermes handbags. I saw a lady with a bright green Kelly today and well… ya. I guess because I’m in Florida they’re very popular. But the bright yellows, greens and some shades of pink….I don’t know. Don’t be mad at me.
While I totally respect your thought about children growing into knowing the brand and establishing a connection early on, my unpopular opinion is that I absolutely dislike the idea of trying to establish any kind of connection between a child and a luxury brand. I'd prefer my children to have memories and experiences that have nothing to do with the world of luxury or brands, no matter if it's Hermès or Chanel or even Nike. To me personally (again, you do you obviously) the only thought I'd want my children to have about luxury brands is that it's just expensive stuff. Of course when they're old enough to get interested in these things on their own, they are free to explore the brands they want and develop the connections they want. But I will not do anything to establish or nurture a connection my children have to a brand that is just selling stuff.If this happens a lot more often as they say, then maybe they need a drop-off zone for “entitled kids” as you call them, and that room be furnished with the H wooden horse, H blankets and pillows, etc…. and introducing them to the brand that way….many of us here grew up making those childhood/teenage trips with our parents… childhood memories (positive or negative) is a huge part of that emotional connection with H…
I 100% agree. I take my 16 year old son to Hermes, Dior, Fendi, etc...He could care less. He's just hanging with his mom and chatting with the SAs who love him (probably more than me). Any time he picks up an item he likes, he gets the same response, "Go to school, get good grades, get a good job and you can buy whatever you want." Lol.While I totally respect your thought about children growing into knowing the brand and establishing a connection early on, my unpopular opinion is that I absolutely dislike the idea of trying to establish any kind of connection between a child and a luxury brand. I'd prefer my children to have memories and experiences that have nothing to do with the world of luxury or brands, no matter if it's Hermès or Chanel or even Nike. To me personally (again, you do you obviously) the only thought I'd want my children to have about luxury brands is that it's just expensive stuff. Of course when they're old enough to get interested in these things on their own, they are free to explore the brands they want and develop the connections they want. But I will not do anything to establish or nurture a connection my children have to a brand that is just selling stuff.
Agreed!Cargo Birkins are ridiculous and ugly!!!
Seeing them on reseller sites for $55K makes me scratch my head. (They have not sold from what I’ve seen.)
Hermes couldn’t pay me to carry that bag.
*ducking*
My unpopular opinion is - as a father of seven kids so I have some experiences - if you take your children to the store, don't stay there for 75 minutes and have them take up all the seats in the middle of the busy section! I was so annoyed tonight when my wife with 12 week old was unable to sit down during the "wish-list appointment" because of a group of entitled 'rude and entitled' peeps allowed their kids to make themselves at home - LITERALLY falling asleep (yeah good one Dad-of-the-year who would rather sleep than supervise his own kids) while his kids slouched all over the chairs playing phones. Um, how about move over to a different area of the store where there are more appropriate places for this - and the shopping areas are made free for paying customers!
I commented how I felt it was too much and to not move your kids for a lady who needs to feed a baby was just wrong. The SA was like - yes, happens every day now.
Sadly this seems to be the normal where parents just let their kids have no boundaries and they are sat with screens to zombie them out so that parents don't have to - you know the word - parent!
ScarfBloke.
I thought I was the only one that doesn't get the hype. Cute but not all that. Definitely not worth the 2 to 3x markup by resellers.I do not care for the Mini Kelly. It was offered to me. Too small. I had a flashback to Gulliver's Travels.
Totally with you! Don't understand charms at all really but definitely not on a Birkin!My unpopular H opinion is that Birkins do not need charms. Charms cheapen them. Birkins are stunning on their own. I only use my Rodeo PM for my Garden Party 36 since the bag is plain and spacious enough to squeeze one Rodeo.
My unpopular H opinion is that Birkins do not need charms. Charms cheapen them. Birkins are stunning on their own. I only use my Rodeo PM for my Garden Party 36 since the bag is plain and spacious enough to squeeze one Rodeo.
Thank You! I’m glad someone said it. Birkins and Kellies don’t need all the charms. I hope I don’t offend anyone, but they are so tacky. I can barely tolerate twillies. I know they are necessary sometimes and I plan on getting 2 for my B30 nata. But it’s a no for me dog. Lol