spiralsnowman O.G. Dec 2, 2005 3,823 10 Mar 10, 2006 #1 Mar 10, 2006 #1 [Follow-up on my post about that wacky monogramed Spy] Apparently, it comes in a hobo too! It looks a little better to me in this style.
[Follow-up on my post about that wacky monogramed Spy] Apparently, it comes in a hobo too! It looks a little better to me in this style.
Loganz older, not wiser O.G. Dec 16, 2005 8,333 588 Mar 10, 2006 #4 Mar 10, 2006 #4 To be honest, if I saw that I would think it was a fake. I am a huge fan of the Spy satchel shape; but, some of their patterns (squirrels, and now this) I am not a fan of.
To be honest, if I saw that I would think it was a fake. I am a huge fan of the Spy satchel shape; but, some of their patterns (squirrels, and now this) I am not a fan of.
Serendipity Member Nov 28, 2005 3,025 11 Mar 10, 2006 #7 Mar 10, 2006 #7 I saw someone purchasing 2 of the larger spy a few weeks ago. I would love to know if people look at themselves holding this in a mirror before they leave the store.
I saw someone purchasing 2 of the larger spy a few weeks ago. I would love to know if people look at themselves holding this in a mirror before they leave the store.
fendigal baguette collector O.G. Mar 1, 2006 2,456 179 Mar 10, 2006 #8 Mar 10, 2006 #8 Please, stop, I can't take it anymore. Has someone in the house of Fendi died recently and been replaced by an alien?
Please, stop, I can't take it anymore. Has someone in the house of Fendi died recently and been replaced by an alien?
happypug Blessed...Psalm 139:13 Mar 2, 2006 367 8 Mar 11, 2006 #10 Mar 11, 2006 #10 Please NO more...I can't see straight. I'm going to have nightmares about ugly purses!!!
ayla nyan nyan percent O.G. Oct 19, 2005 25,848 138 Mar 11, 2006 #11 Mar 11, 2006 #11 So.. unbelievably ugly. I don't understand why they insist on milking the shapes with this ugly print !
So.. unbelievably ugly. I don't understand why they insist on milking the shapes with this ugly print !
kathyrose The Bargain Hunter O.G. Dec 12, 2005 17,496 58 Mar 11, 2006 #12 Mar 11, 2006 #12 No, no, no, no!!! Ahhh!