‘The It Bag is dead: the whole thing was just getting revolting'

punjabi84chic

Member
Apr 30, 2008
95
0
‘The It Bag is dead: the whole thing was just getting revolting'

the-it-bag-is-dead-anya-hindmarch-415x275.jpg


If ever a fashion accessory came to define the conspicuous over-consumption of the mid-Noughties, it was the luxury designer handbag.
The “must-have” bag that changed with every season, seen on the arm of Angelina or Jennifer or Keira or Kate, quickly became an iconic symbol of extravagant wealth and female status. Even with price tags that ran into many hundreds of pounds, the “It Bag” was lusted after by all — and bought by many who simply could not afford it.

Well, those days are gone. That “overheated, frenzied handbag moment” is over, says, of all people, luxury bag designer Anya Hindmarch. The £1,000-plus bag, without which even the averagely fashion-conscious female could not exist, is finally dead — killed off by the credit crunch, impending recession and the gas bill.

“I think it was overheated and pretty disgusting, actually,” Hindmarch goes on. “There was a point at which the queue of people waiting for one particular handbag — not necessarily one of ours — was ridiculously long, and then it's not even a luxury experience, it becomes a mass market. The whole thing was getting a bit revolting. I've always thought the really, really expensive bag, which then becomes completely unfashionable the next season, is a bit dishonest, and I think customers are more intelligent than that.”
It might seem trivial to discuss handbags while, in the City, pension funds are dwindling and jobs evaporating but in decades to come social historians will surely credit the end of the mass-produced-yet-hugely-expensive It Bag with a return to financial sanity. Certainly Hindmarch, who has more than 30 outlets around the world selling beautiful bags (plus shoes, coats and cashmere jumpers) from £300 to £1,400, talks about the “inevitable shrinking of the market” with great seriousness, and not a little anxiety. “I'm not a silly trite fashionista,” she says at one point, as if anyone might mistake her hard business head and a company worth a reported £20 million.
Indeed, 40-year-old Hindmarch has her finger on many pulses in London. In tomorrow's Evening Standard London Influentials list, she appears in two separate categories — as a key influence in both fashion and social circles. This year, for example, she masterminded the annual Conservative Black & White Ball — she counts the Camerons as friends — and was credited with transforming its hitherto stuffy image (guests included Tamara Mellon, Belle Robinson, co-founder of Jigsaw, and Jemima Khan). Though Hindmarch claims not to “know much about art”, she collects it and is a fundraiser for the Royal Academy with a special interest in the defiantly un-trendy Summer Exhibition (Bianca Jagger, Alexa Chung and Erin O'Connor turned out for this year's preview party, which Hindmarch co-hosted).
After 22 years in the bag business (and here's the startling bit, with five children), Hindmarch, you feel, is as well-connected as any Sloane with a bulging BlackBerry. Yet she is totally self-made, having struck out in business at 18, the product of a childhood in Essex. In person she is more down-to-earth than any self-celebrating fashion bod I've ever met. “You have to fight like hell in business,” she says, “Like an alley cat sometimes.”
How worried is she for London's fashion economy? “It's a bad analogy but there's that same feeling of shock people had after 9/11. When banks start to go bust, you feel a bit like your parents are splitting up. There's that air of unreality; all your foundations are rocked. I've had [staff members] saying, Anya, should I take all my money out of the bank? And you think, Christ, that would be a disaster — but maybe, you know, you should…

“I've been through two recessions — though not as bad, I suspect, as this one is going to be. You have to stay on the wobbleboard and maintain your composure. At this point, you have to be better than everyone else. The [luxury fashion] market is going to shrink and even those who haven't lost money will feel it's a bit distasteful to go out and spend [large amounts].”

In the new era of austerity, instead of buying four or five handbags a year, Hindmarch expects women to buy one and “treasure it” — or to use last year's, or even to dig out something much older. Neither will we be quite so susceptible, she thinks, to the power of celebrity endorsement. “I don't like the sheep mentality,” she says. “I mean, of course it's human nature but I don't like it, I think it's stupid.” A £675 Hindmarch bag called The Cooper, of course, was an It Bag itself, as worn primarily by Angelina Jolie. “The It Bag was a hugely powerful marketing tool,” she says, “and certainly we had bags some people called It Bags, but generally it's not what I stand for as a brand. What's important to me is lasting design, something you can hand onto your grandchildren.”
The desirability of Hindmarch bags has had one much-publicised consequence, however. Seven times this year, one of her shops or warehouses in London has been “ram-raided” by thieves, with a loss of more than £100,000 of stock. “Yeah, we're hot as hell in the underworld,” she says very wryly indeed. You can tell that Hindmarch, who has now installed cutting-edge security kit in all her shops, is beyond mere frustration on this.
On other subjects, though, she is not uptight at all. I'm impressed by her ability to cope with five kids on top of the business, the fundraising, the socialising. When Hindmarch was 25, she “inherited” three little children upon marrying James Seymour, a fashion finance director whose first wife died during an operation. She has since had another two, so the family now ranges from five-year-old Otto to 19-year-old Hugo (with Tia, 18, Bert, 16, and eight-year-old Felix in between). Where does she stand on that great debate on the Ruth Kelly question, the minister who resigned to spend more time at home?
“Look, there are times when I'm not a great businesswoman or a great mother. In some respects I wish I had it in me to stay at home and be completely happy. I think it probably is slightly better for kids to have a mother around the whole time.” Of course she has a nanny, and an office in Wandsworth just five minutes' drive from her home in Chelsea; plus a well-oiled chain of command at home. Yet Kelly's timing does have merit to it, she says. “I think they probably do need you more as they get older. But children are quite selfish, too, they'll tell you when they want more of you.”
Hindmarch is clearly no fan of Kelly's politics. She was very much a teenager of “Thatcher's Britain”, and admired it hugely. Her entrepreneurial parents — her father had his own plastics business — were influential, and she describes her dad, who sits on her board, as “my harshest critic”.
“I think I was inspired by that time [of Thatcher] that culture of get out there and get going. It was the time of Tie Rack and The Sock Shop. Sophie Mirman [the founder of The Sock Shop] is a good friend. Sometimes I see her and think: Wow, you were my hero, I studied you in business studies A-level, you were like God.”
Will business students study Hindmarch? Well, at least one of her bags has gone down in retail history. In April last year, 80,000 people queued outside branches of Sainsbury's for her I'm Not A Plastic Bag cotton shopper — undoubtedly the green phenomenon of that year, and a project that has certainly influenced high-street supermarkets since. It's fascinating to hear how petrified Hindmarch was about this move beforehand.
“Someone accused me of using it as a marketing ploy but you know what, it categorically wasn't. It was a real risk for me, you know, partnering with Sainsbury's.” Yet she clearly won her dare.
For all her common sense and sheer niceness, however, I do have a problem with Anya Hindmarch. If there's a moral imperative for all of us to buy and use cotton shopping bags, aren't there, equally, plenty of good reasons not to spend £1,000 on a pretty holdall? It's a question, of course, guaranteed to wind up a luxury handbag designer. If few can afford it right now, shouldn't everyone find something better to do with that much money?
She thinks I'm being naive. “Yes, it's decadent, but I also believe that doing nice things for yourself is important — as long as that's not all you're doing. I couldn't bear never to give to charity. I couldn't bear to spend Imelda Marcos sums on shoes and handbags. But I do what I can, I do my bit and if I have a handbag to cheer me up, that I will love and keep for a long time, then fantastic. I think if you lose aspiration, then you lose the will to live.”

Which is all perfectly eloquent, and fair enough. But I know there won't be a £1,000 handbag under my Christmas tree this year.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/stand...+thing+was+just+getting+revolting'/article.do
 
Thanks for posting this article.

I think she may be comparing her bags to other 'it' bags as more affordable; this stuff is all relative. Some people won't spend $100 on a bag while others don't blink at dropping two grand. Whatever is out of your comfort zone is usually considered 'too much.'

I liked the background info, though.
 
I felt the same way. For a while there were many people who couldn't afford the bag but bought it anyways just because it was a status simble. They were faking themself rich. To me, they were a knock off as a human- they're bag may not be fake but they are! Why do people need to pretend to be glamorous? I don't mind people who save or charge it & pay it off right away who doesn't have money. But people who just get it & act like they are the paris hilton- no need! Save the job for someone else who accually has it. Pretty isn't snoby its being yourself. I hope all these 'Want it NOW- pay for it whenever' people will learn by the crisis were in. Peace.
 
Thanks for posting this article.

I think she may be comparing her bags to other 'it' bags as more affordable; this stuff is all relative. Some people won't spend $100 on a bag while others don't blink at dropping two grand. Whatever is out of your comfort zone is usually considered 'too much.'

I liked the background info, though.

I agree.
 
I felt the same way. For a while there were many people who couldn't afford the bag but bought it anyways just because it was a status simble. They were faking themself rich. To me, they were a knock off as a human- they're bag may not be fake but they are! Why do people need to pretend to be glamorous? I don't mind people who save or charge it & pay it off right away who doesn't have money. But people who just get it & act like they are the paris hilton- no need! Save the job for someone else who accually has it. Pretty isn't snoby its being yourself. I hope all these 'Want it NOW- pay for it whenever' people will learn by the crisis were in. Peace.



theres no way to tell if someone consiously or unconsiously bought a designer bag as a status symbol. thats just what they are whether youre thinking about it or not. and does someone buying a bag with credit mean that theyre fake bc they cant afford to buy it outright? i can understand your view if youre refering to people buying fake bags, bc they want to look like they wear designers when they dont. but how can you say that about someone who saves and works hard to buy designer bc they like the quality and fashion, even if its normally out of their price range. im sure there are plenty of people like that on this site, and i dont really see that as being fake.
 
I think some people like to self-deprecate so that they seem more in touch with their status/more in control of what they're doing. It makes the criticisms of their lives less harsh because they are proving that they already understand them.
 
Most of these designer brands would be out of business if people weren't allowed to buy on credit. The majority of people buying these handbags and accessories and clothes etc. aren't paying them off that month. Why do you think the economy is such a mess right now? It's because people took home equity loans when their houses were worth more, paid off their credit cards and bought more stuff with the money, then they started charging on their credit cards again because they weren't maxed out, and they have no other way to get credit now because of the housing loan collapse. Of course, it's much more complex than this, but you can't say that whole mentality didn't contribute.

It's such a myth that only rich people buy designer stuff. Sure, many do, but there are lots of rich people who don't buy designer, it just isn't important to them or they'd rather save their money or buy other things. And then there are many who can't really afford it but they scrimp and save or they put it on their credit card and pay over time. It doesn't make them a fake person, they bought the item and they can buy it for any reason they want. It's not the smartest move IMO, but everybody has different priorities. When it comes down to it, it's all just "stuff" and in the end it doesn't really matter what "stuff" you have or someone else has.
 
theres no way to tell if someone consiously or unconsiously bought a designer bag as a status symbol. thats just what they are whether youre thinking about it or not. and does someone buying a bag with credit mean that theyre fake bc they cant afford to buy it outright? i can understand your view if youre refering to people buying fake bags, bc they want to look like they wear designers when they dont. but how can you say that about someone who saves and works hard to buy designer bc they like the quality and fashion, even if its normally out of their price range. im sure there are plenty of people like that on this site, and i dont really see that as being fake.

I wanna quote something I wrote in the post. "I don't mind people who save or charge it & pay it off right away who doesn't have money." I am trying to get at the people who charge it & then pays it off whenever, THATS WHY WE ARE IN THE FINANCIAL CRISIS. Thank God someone spoke up about passing the 700 billion dollar bill, otherwise every person in america would be paying 10k per person. Let me ask this; Why else would someone who doesn't intend to pay (AND YEAH THERE ARE PEOPLE OUT THERE LIKE THAT, financial crisis.) for something get it? Status. I am buying a HUGE house, putting it on a loan... & then try to pay taxes. Not gonna happen. Why do people who can really only afford a Jeep go out of the way and buy a Cadillac Escalade? Status. Everyone is intitled to their own opinion. I hope I didn't offend anyone. Maybe if you did get offended you should read what I wrote again. All I am trying to say is there are people out there that doesn't pay their credit back, thats why we are in a financial crisis. And if you would have read it closer you would have seen I said; "I don't mind people who save or charge it & pay it off right away who doesn't have money." Thanks, Calli
 
Thanks for posting the interview! I have been fascinated by AH bags for a while and it was great to read about the designer and her take on her niche in the fashion world.
 
I think 'I'm not a Plastic Bag' was definitely an It bag. In her book, an It bag is probably a bad thing, ephemeral and overpriced.

I think she justifies her expensive bags because to her, life without 'aspiration' is meaningless. On the pf, I ogle over a hundred bags every year but I only buy 3. Yet, if not for the thought of aspiring to buy myself something beautiful and reading the pf every day, I might not get out of bed some days. ;)

I do think that people are losing perspective on the financial crisis. Shrewd investments are great, capitalism and greed create growth and progress. It's stupid investments that's caused the bubble to burst. To relate that to our purse concerns, expensive bags are beautiful, luxury is inspiring, it's silly people that buy beyond their means that get into trouble.