Tamara Khatuntseva of Boston gets 90 days in prison for scheme to swap Gucci merchandise for TJ Maxx items

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Aug 29, 2021
13
11
A Boston woman will spend 90 days in prison after she admitted to a scheme to exchange merchandise purchased at Gucci and other high-end stores for similar-looking, but lower-cost items from retailers like TJ Maxx.


Tamara Khatuntseva, a 64-year-old West Roxbury resident, bought expensive jewelry, clothing and handbags from pricey stores and sold them on eBay. But Khatuntseva would simultaneously purchase similar items from other stores at more affordable prices, and then return them to the high-end retailers for full refunds, U.S. Attorney Rachael Rollins’s office said.

In one instance, according to Rollins, Khatuntseva bought a $399 pink Gucci scarf and posted it for sale on her eBay page. Days later, she returned a different, less expensive scarf — which now bore the same barcode — to the store for a refund.



Prosecutors said she did this with jewelry, clothing, purses, handbags, luggage and shoes between December 2018 and August 2020.



The investigation found Khatuntseva used multiple eBay accounts, opened credit cards under her daughter’s name and bought the same security tags used by Gucci to disguise the returned cheaper merchandise as a legitimate purchase from the pricey fashion store.



The scheme cost retailers up to $150,000 and netted Khatuntseva hundreds of thousands of dollars in profits, officials said.

More >>>

Can't believe she got away with this! How could she make so many returns without getting noticed as a serial returner? Did Gucci not look at the junk she was returning? Not only that but crime pays for her. 90 days in prison and has to pay pennies on the dollar what she made of her scam.
 
A Boston woman will spend 90 days in prison after she admitted to a scheme to exchange merchandise purchased at Gucci and other high-end stores for similar-looking, but lower-cost items from retailers like TJ Maxx.


Tamara Khatuntseva, a 64-year-old West Roxbury resident, bought expensive jewelry, clothing and handbags from pricey stores and sold them on eBay. But Khatuntseva would simultaneously purchase similar items from other stores at more affordable prices, and then return them to the high-end retailers for full refunds, U.S. Attorney Rachael Rollins’s office said.

In one instance, according to Rollins, Khatuntseva bought a $399 pink Gucci scarf and posted it for sale on her eBay page. Days later, she returned a different, less expensive scarf — which now bore the same barcode — to the store for a refund.



Prosecutors said she did this with jewelry, clothing, purses, handbags, luggage and shoes between December 2018 and August 2020.



The investigation found Khatuntseva used multiple eBay accounts, opened credit cards under her daughter’s name and bought the same security tags used by Gucci to disguise the returned cheaper merchandise as a legitimate purchase from the pricey fashion store.



The scheme cost retailers up to $150,000 and netted Khatuntseva hundreds of thousands of dollars in profits, officials said.

More >>>

Can't believe she got away with this! How could she make so many returns without getting noticed as a serial returner? Did Gucci not look at the junk she was returning? Not only that but crime pays for her. 90 days in prison and has to pay pennies on the dollar what she made of her scam.
90 days isn't enough....I don't suppose she will pay back any of the money she stole
 
Question is, how many more scammers are out there doing the same thing and not getting caught? I believe that when you return something at Nordstrom, a photo of the item pops up on the employee's computer when they run the barcode. So a return had better look like the original item but I can still see how this system gets duped.
 
  • Insightful
  • Like
Reactions: 880 and JVSXOXO
I just now read this article and hoooo boy are people crooked. But also, I laughed at this math:

The scheme cost retailers up to $150,000 and netted Khatuntseva hundreds of thousands of dollars in profits, officials said.

She wasn't selling the items for over retail price (because the money-making part of the scam is to sell it faster/cheaper than people would pay at the retailer, so the eBay ad has to be more appealing), so how was she making hundreds of thousands while the retailers only lost up to $150,000?

For example, if I bought a $5000 bag from Gucci, then I sold it on eBay for $4500, then I purchase a lesser bag from somewhere else for $3000, then return it to Gucci, the net is: Gucci lost $5000, I made $1500. (Hence my question of how she could be making more than retailers actually lost.)

I love me some good math, but that article statement wasn't clarified well. </ends nerd> :P
 
Top