It's interesting that the article didn't mention it, because LV was on the list. The Luxury Insitute web site has the full list (alphabetically) here with the original press release:
http://www.luxuryinstitute.com/doclib/doclib_popup.cgi?file=374-300a8323d672a519eac97177bbac1418.pdf
I love the way you put it! I totally agree with you.i can't believe people are surprised vuitton isn't in the top 3 - you can't be prestigious when you're the mcdonalds of luxury and their bags are mass made.
Well if those brands weren't included, it is because those women don't care much for those brands. Just because people on here like those brands does not mean women everywhere think those brands are great and prestigious. I never thought of Balenciaga, Mulberry, or Jimmy Chooas being prestigious when it came to handbags. Those brands are just more trendy than anything.Whoever came up with this list doesn't spend any time on TPF. Where are Balenciaga and Jimmy Choo and Mulberry, as well as Marni, Goyard, VBH and Derek Lam? But Brighton and Dooney & Bourke make the list of "luxury" brands?
i can't believe people are surprised vuitton isn't in the top 3 - you can't be prestigious when you're the mcdonalds of luxury and their bags are mass made.