You had this authenticated in the authenticate this Chanel thread on the 22nd of December. ColorfulBelle suggested that there had been alterations, so presumably you knew to expect that before you paid for it. From the design and label it's an older jacket, so it would be normal to expect that it's been used and people who shell out big money on jackets (thousands of dollars for a Chanel Wool and Silk blazer) might have had them tailored at some point.
Yep, and I'm glad she noticed that because I didn't from the photo. While it is a vintage jacket, the seller had listed it as MINT. So while some wear would be expected of a vintage piece, this was allegedly not the case. Also, I should state/reiterate that I didn't really care about any alterations in regards to fit, b/c I read the measurements and knew that the jacket would fit, or possibly be very slightly loose, which I was prepared for.
The thing that bothered me about the alterations was that they were MESSY. The photo in the listing only shows a small corner of the back hem of the jacket, so it's unable to see most of the tailoring. It was sloppy, uneven, and looked like it had the potential to come undone.
That's what the big deal is to me. Not that it had been altered, as I know many Chanel jackets are basically made to be altered. I was upset that it had been altered poorly.
And to reiterate again, I had made my peace with this and decided to keep it and not say anything further. It wasn't until I discovered that the sleeves had been altered and was starting to come OFF, that I got really upset.
And yes, at the point that I contacted the seller about this it was about 2.5 weeks since I received the jacket. But the stitching under the sleeves is not a place where damage is obvious. It wasn't until I noticed that the side seems looked off and actually lifted up the sleeve all the way that I noticed it was coming apart.
I know that a lot of us here are sellers, and I know it sucks when buyers will receive a well worn item which is greatly discounted and proclaim, "There's a smudge you missed!", and try to eke out an even further discount. I've had it happen to me and that is not how I operate when I buy.
However, buyers being crappy sometimes doesn't mean that sellers aren't able to legitimately miss things in their descriptions. There seems to be a bit of a double standard--it's okay that the buyer "missed" these damages in her description, but it's not okay that it took me a couple of weeks to notice the full extent of the damage. It's not really fair to imply that one is okay, but the other isn't.
And no matter how many bad experiences the seller has had with other buyers, it's not okay that she was abrasive from the get go. As I said, I understand her not giving me a partial refund, and even though it would be ideal in my mind, I do think that doing so perpetuates the trend for buyers to be a pain in the butt until they get what they want. But being rude and abrasive, and not even uttering a simple apology or acknowledging that MAYBE there were things that she missed is pretty crappy, IMO. Obviously not every single imperfection can be noticed or disclosed, but I think that this specific one should have been.