.jourdyn. living & loving life Feb 17, 2009 3,255 14 Feb 7, 2010 #31 Feb 7, 2010 #31 Uhh...I think I may have to pass on them. lol They aren't even that nice at all.
K kitkatsunshine Member Dec 17, 2009 281 1 Feb 9, 2010 #32 Feb 9, 2010 #32 the bags are unreasonable priced. could get a lot more for the price, yeah?
Ilgin O.G. Jan 18, 2009 2,240 3 Feb 20, 2010 #34 Feb 20, 2010 #34 FullyLoaded said: The $3,000 CLs look better than all of those shoes. Click to expand... Ita three.
L lovelypinkx Member Feb 15, 2010 59 0 Feb 20, 2010 #35 Feb 20, 2010 #35 if someone actually buys a pair of shoes with that money that's just retarded. you could buy whole collections of the designers out there instead of a pair of shoes. you could do plenty of things with that money.
if someone actually buys a pair of shoes with that money that's just retarded. you could buy whole collections of the designers out there instead of a pair of shoes. you could do plenty of things with that money.
I ibezj Member Nov 3, 2008 703 0 Feb 20, 2010 #36 Feb 20, 2010 #36 Wow, I am speechless. Let's just say I would not wear diamonds below my waist...
K kitkatsunshine Member Dec 17, 2009 281 1 Feb 21, 2010 #37 Feb 21, 2010 #37 ibezj said: Wow, I am speechless. Let's just say I would not wear diamonds below my waist... Click to expand... i like that.. no diamonds below waist . . . true true..
ibezj said: Wow, I am speechless. Let's just say I would not wear diamonds below my waist... Click to expand... i like that.. no diamonds below waist . . . true true..
~Fabulousity~ O.G. Jan 25, 2006 25,468 47 Feb 22, 2010 #38 Feb 22, 2010 #38 those shoes are not even cute