Hello everyone,
I am hoping to purchase a new bracelet in the near future and cannot decide between the Tiffany's RTT rose gold bead bracelet or the David Yurman buckle bracelet with pave diamonds. I currently wear 2 small rose gold loves and a thin rose gold JUC with diamonds. (I would post pictures, but my loves are currently being resized.)


I already own 2 silver bead bracelets from Tiffany's and love them, so I know I would get a lot of wear out of the rose gold one. My husband also prefers that one, as he says the buckle on the DY bracelet reminds him of a monkey lol. When I tried it on in store, I loved the look of it, but when looking back at pictures with my other bracelets, it seems to be a lot of the same colour, since almost everything is solid rose gold.
I've tried on the DY one as well, and also love how it looks. I like that it has diamonds, which breaks up the solid gold look. But it's definitely a fancier bracelet, so part of me wonders if I'll want to wear it all the time like my Cartier ones.
Please let me know which bracelet you think would be the better option. Tiffany's seems like the "safer" choice (and I do prefer Tiffany's in general) but I don't own any David Yurman and this is a beautiful piece to add to my collection. I also feel like the DY would be pretty to wear alone!
I am hoping to purchase a new bracelet in the near future and cannot decide between the Tiffany's RTT rose gold bead bracelet or the David Yurman buckle bracelet with pave diamonds. I currently wear 2 small rose gold loves and a thin rose gold JUC with diamonds. (I would post pictures, but my loves are currently being resized.)


I already own 2 silver bead bracelets from Tiffany's and love them, so I know I would get a lot of wear out of the rose gold one. My husband also prefers that one, as he says the buckle on the DY bracelet reminds him of a monkey lol. When I tried it on in store, I loved the look of it, but when looking back at pictures with my other bracelets, it seems to be a lot of the same colour, since almost everything is solid rose gold.
I've tried on the DY one as well, and also love how it looks. I like that it has diamonds, which breaks up the solid gold look. But it's definitely a fancier bracelet, so part of me wonders if I'll want to wear it all the time like my Cartier ones.
Please let me know which bracelet you think would be the better option. Tiffany's seems like the "safer" choice (and I do prefer Tiffany's in general) but I don't own any David Yurman and this is a beautiful piece to add to my collection. I also feel like the DY would be pretty to wear alone!