An interesting article from Toronto Sun, but it has a few gaps imo.
From afar, the May 2018 wedding was like the others: grand and filled with all the pomp and circumstance that comes with an event of that magnitude.
Knowing what we now know of Meghan, she clearly had her fingers in every pie…
Not questioning that.
All of it was intentional, according to two royal commentators, who believe her choices were designed to show the world she would not forget her history as she became a part of the Royal Family.
However, she completely forgot her family, including her father.
“I think there’s every sign that the marriage of Harry and Meghan marked the beginnings of something different, or at least that Meghan wanted to curate things in her own way,” said royal historian Anna Whitelock in the documentary, Fergie and Meghan: Inconvenient Royals, according to the Daily Star.
We got that.
“For Meghan, being a woman of colour, having a gospel choir that were mostly black, and having a black minister as well… while that might not seem political — and perhaps it shouldn’t be seen as political — it absolutely was a political choice and I think she was trying to send a very clear message.”
Adebayo added: “She wasn’t going to be leaving behind who she was.”
that is better to give her whatever she wants, or…
What no one knew was that she was going to leave the U.K. behind – and take Harry with her.
The question now is, will they ever return? More importantly, and based on their plummeting popularity, do Britons even want them back?
My bet is on the NO
Meghan Markle’s ‘political’ wedding choices send ‘very clear message’
Two royal commentators believe Meghan's choices were designed to show the world she would not forget her history as she became a royal.torontosun.com
Chanbal, yes one gap in particular, there are multiple citations and quotes from Choir sources, Prince Charles arranged for the Gospel Choir at the wedding, not the bride and groom.An interesting article from Toronto Sun, but it has a few gaps imo.
From afar, the May 2018 wedding was like the others: grand and filled with all the pomp and circumstance that comes with an event of that magnitude.
Knowing what we now know of Meghan, she clearly had her fingers in every pie…
Not questioning that.
All of it was intentional, according to two royal commentators, who believe her choices were designed to show the world she would not forget her history as she became a part of the Royal Family.
However, she completely forgot her family, including her father.
“I think there’s every sign that the marriage of Harry and Meghan marked the beginnings of something different, or at least that Meghan wanted to curate things in her own way,” said royal historian Anna Whitelock in the documentary, Fergie and Meghan: Inconvenient Royals, according to the Daily Star.
We got that.
“For Meghan, being a woman of colour, having a gospel choir that were mostly black, and having a black minister as well… while that might not seem political — and perhaps it shouldn’t be seen as political — it absolutely was a political choice and I think she was trying to send a very clear message.”
Adebayo added: “She wasn’t going to be leaving behind who she was.”
that is better to give her whatever she wants, or…
What no one knew was that she was going to leave the U.K. behind – and take Harry with her.
The question now is, will they ever return? More importantly, and based on their plummeting popularity, do Britons even want them back?
My bet is on the NO
Meghan Markle’s ‘political’ wedding choices send ‘very clear message’
Two royal commentators believe Meghan's choices were designed to show the world she would not forget her history as she became a royal.
What six's wife wants…
Ms Montague claims that when Prince Philip demanded that Fergie was not to receive an invite to the big day: "Harry intervened and said, 'this is what I want.'
"'This is what my bride wants as well. She has bonded with Fergie and she wants her there.''
Prince Harry snubbed Prince Philip demands to secure invite for Fergie
PRINCE HARRY ignored Prince Phillip's demands to exclude Fergie from his wedding with Meghan Markle, a new documentary has claimed.www.express.co.uk
.
, but …. all of this chatter concerning Reese most surely will backfire on H&M at some point. My impression is Hwood does not care for their A listers being dragged by a never-did-that-well z lister. Look what has happened to Angie and Brad, both A listers. It will not end well. Predicting doom and gloom, 
Considering her desire to modernize the BRF, she probably assumed she could lead by example
and make them celebrities. All those wardrobe malfunctions count towards her Dare to Bare.I'm against her top half - the scheming brain, slut strands, mutable face. Hazard can praise the bottom half.
She has history? I thought she rewrote her life.An interesting article from Toronto Sun, but it has a few gaps imo.
From afar, the May 2018 wedding was like the others: grand and filled with all the pomp and circumstance that comes with an event of that magnitude.
Knowing what we now know of Meghan, she clearly had her fingers in every pie…
Not questioning that.
All of it was intentional, according to two royal commentators, who believe her choices were designed to show the world she would not forget her history as she became a part of the Royal Family.
However, she completely forgot her family, including her father.
“I think there’s every sign that the marriage of Harry and Meghan marked the beginnings of something different, or at least that Meghan wanted to curate things in her own way,” said royal historian Anna Whitelock in the documentary, Fergie and Meghan: Inconvenient Royals, according to the Daily Star.
We got that.
“For Meghan, being a woman of colour, having a gospel choir that were mostly black, and having a black minister as well… while that might not seem political — and perhaps it shouldn’t be seen as political — it absolutely was a political choice and I think she was trying to send a very clear message.”
Adebayo added: “She wasn’t going to be leaving behind who she was.”
that is better to give her whatever she wants, or…
What no one knew was that she was going to leave the U.K. behind – and take Harry with her.
The question now is, will they ever return? More importantly, and based on their plummeting popularity, do Britons even want them back?
My bet is on the NO
Meghan Markle’s ‘political’ wedding choices send ‘very clear message’
Two royal commentators believe Meghan's choices were designed to show the world she would not forget her history as she became a royal.
Hear, hear! Methane gave that choir a hard time as Bridezilla.
You are both right, I recall to have read that. It's also possible that he went along with her requests… We will never know, but the idea that she was always very demanding is very clear.
So Meghan "bonded" with Fergie to the point of insisting that she be invited to her but wanted nothing to do with HER OWN family other than Doria. Oh. Yet, it was the BRF paying for the 50 million dollar wedding. Another sign that Miseryghan was going against the royal grain on purpose just to spite them for the hell of it. Anyone surprised? How close to Fergie is she NOW? Why hasn't Fergie visited them? I mean, they BONDED and everything
So Meghan "bonded" with Fergie to the point of insisting that she be invited to her but wanted nothing to do with HER OWN family other than Doria. Oh. Yet, it was the BRF paying for the 50 million dollar wedding. Another sign that Miseryghan was going against the royal grain on purpose just to spite them for the hell of it. Anyone surprised? How close to Fergie is she NOW? Why hasn't Fergie visited them? I mean, they BONDED and everything
Thanks @rose60610 for the nickname Miseryghan. Yes, M is at least 1/2 part misery; misery that she inflicts on others. Welcome to The List. 
View attachment 5194302
