"He only lives an hour and a half away"
That's a 3 hour round trip for play date. Probably just happened one time.His kids are 11 & 7 & 4. No 11 year old would want to hang out with a baby and 3 year old.
Last edited:
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle thread
- Thread starter MissThing
- Start date
That's a 3 hour round trip for play date. Probably just happened one time.His kids are 11 & 7 & 4. No 11 year old would want to hang out with a baby and 3 year old.
I wonder if this should be posted on the appreciation thread instead, it's about the Eurovision song on TW's lush hair. 
Last edited:
Excellent interview. Agree, he knows lots more than he has shared.
TM says yes to a divorce. Also, he reveals that MM wrote another book about having 2 of everything [since her parents were divorced]. So, brace yourselves - 2 on 2 may be in the works.
RE: her hair - watch this story. My guess it is about to get much uglier with some very loaded accusations. Just my opinion.
ETA: wonder if he has been advising MM. Ya know, through unnamed sources, etc. The public spats could be just for show.
Guessing the BRF knows the truth.
Last edited:
think §768.295 is the statute number … she will probably ask for a lot more, knowing her
Everything is possible at this point.Excellent interview. Agree, he knows lots more than he has shared.
TM says yes to a divorce. Also, he reveals that MM wrote another book about having 2 of everything [since her parents were divorced]. So, brace yourselves - 2 on 2 may be in the works.
RE: her hair - watch this story. My guess it is about to get much uglier with some very loaded accusations. Just my opinion.
ETA: wonder if he has been advising MM. Ya know, through unnamed sources, etc. The public spats could be just for show.
Guessing the BRF knows the truth.
Oh yes! In this case, they are not calling the First Amendment 'bonkers'… It's disgusting.think §768.295 is the statute number … she will probably ask for a lot more, knowing her
It's possible that SM is being helped, her new team of lawyers is fit for a (ex) President.
"In the motion to dismiss filed Friday, Meghan’s lawyers denied all of Markle’s allegations — and stated that even if they were true, the duchess's half-sister would still have no case: first, because the statements that Meghan made about Markle in her 2018 briefing email to Knauf were made outside of Florida’s two-year statute of limitations for defamation; second, because Meghan didn’t write Finding Freedom; and finally, because Meghan’s statements about her half-sister in the email and in the Oprah interview are substantially true — and protected by the First Amendment. The filing included an itemized list of responses to all 17 of the statements that Samantha Markle claimed were defamatory.
The motion’s request that Markle be compelled to pay Meghan’s legal fees is based on a Florida law that prohibits lawsuits filed against individuals who are exercising their right to free speech in connection with public issues."
Meghan Markle Has Filed A Motion To Dismiss Her Half-Sister's Defamation Lawsuit
The duchess has asked a Florida court to compel Samantha Markle to pay Meghan’s attorneys’ fees.
I feel it’s an open secret at this point that most of these hosts are awful people - the only safe bets are Graham Norton and maybe Conan.
JC’s sense of humour is grating for me personally and he can be rude even to his guests but a lot of Brits don’t like him because he was in a comedy duo and they think he abandoned his partner and even sabotaged their projects so he could go to LA ASAP so there’s certainly some bad blood there.
it’s offensive to freedom of speech and it’s offensively hammy too. Apparently chilling is now defined as ‘my bitter b*tch sister called me a bitter b*tch’ when will the horrors endThis is truly unbelievable…
What’s the tweet? it’s been deleted
I hope Samantha is getting bankrolled as M has had the full power of the BRF for her nuisance suits. It’s all so incredibly spurious. What’s good for the goose…Everything is possible at this point.
Oh yes! In this case, they are not calling the First Amendment 'bonkers'… It's disgusting.
It's possible that SM is being helped, her new team of lawyers is fit for a (ex) President.
"In the motion to dismiss filed Friday, Meghan’s lawyers denied all of Markle’s allegations — and stated that even if they were true, the duchess's half-sister would still have no case: first, because the statements that Meghan made about Markle in her 2018 briefing email to Knauf were made outside of Florida’s two-year statute of limitations for defamation; second, because Meghan didn’t write Finding Freedom; and finally, because Meghan’s statements about her half-sister in the email and in the Oprah interview are substantially true — and protected by the First Amendment. The filing included an itemized list of responses to all 17 of the statements that Samantha Markle claimed were defamatory.
The motion’s request that Markle be compelled to pay Meghan’s legal fees is based on a Florida law that prohibits lawsuits filed against individuals who are exercising their right to free speech in connection with public issues."
View attachment 5403004
Meghan Markle Has Filed A Motion To Dismiss Her Half-Sister's Defamation Lawsuit
The duchess has asked a Florida court to compel Samantha Markle to pay Meghan’s attorneys’ fees.www.buzzfeednews.com
Fingers crossed S gets a nice wad of notes out of it. She could even buy a Valentino dress that actually fits her!
This is not a coincidence. Princess Diana's jewelry on TW. I think she spends a lot of time practicing her acting chops. Sick.
I SOOOO hope they stay in Cali and don't turn up at the Jubilee: their presence would definately spoil it for everyone else, especially for the Queen!!!
It is derived from African proverbs. When I was doing ethnography courses, I read about how in some African villages/tribes, raising children was a communal task. All adults looked out for and helped take care of the children. What particularly stuck in my mind was how the nursing mothers would allow any infant or toddler to suckle, not only their own offspring. Orphaned children were taken care of by the entire village.What, actually, does that mean? It sounds so pretentious! Usually, there are two parents who manage together. It seems to suggest that the parents can't/won't take responsibility for raising their child/children and expect others to help?
I don't know, just seems a load of old word salad to me!
This is definitely not an attitude I'd associate with Methane and her No Free Milk motto in life, apart from the expectation she has that the "village" should pay for her to lead a life of luxury.
Even with little time to spare, many of us will come to this thread. So I'm sharing this beautiful story here; its relation to this thread has to do with Big Will, a main target of the Harkles.
www.theguardian.com
Prince William presents damehood to Deborah James as cancer fundraiser raises £5m
Duke of Cambridge makes personal visit after ‘Bowelbabe’ told supporters she was receiving end-of-life care for her condition
I read about Bowelbabe. I really respect her. She was one of 3 women hosting a programme called You, Me and the Big C. One of her co-hosts has already passed away from cancer. No fake compassion here. They are the real deal.Even with little time to spare, many of us will come to this thread. So I'm sharing this beautiful story here; its relation to this thread has to do with Big Will, a main target of the Harkles.
Prince William presents damehood to Deborah James as cancer fundraiser raises £5m
Duke of Cambridge makes personal visit after ‘Bowelbabe’ told supporters she was receiving end-of-life care for her condition
Did not know that, thanks. Pretty sh*tty if he did.