@bag-mania can we trust this? 
www.newsweek.com
It looks like there is an upcoming article from Montecito claiming that Kate owes her confidence to Mrs. Hypocrisy.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Covered More Positively in U.K. Media Than U.S. Last Month
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle got a greater percentage of positive coverage in British mainstream media than American in September, according to analysis for Newsweek by a data intelligence agency.
British mainstream media outlets from print to broadcast delivered 50 percent positive coverage, 16 percent neutral and 33 percent negative over the course of the month, research by Zignal Labs suggests.
Reporting by American mainstream media outlets was 44 percent positive, 28 percent neutral and 28 percent negative.
The mainstream media was more positive than social media in both countries, according to the research.
It comes after Prince Harry told Oprah Winfrey in March the couple left Britain in part because of racism, adding that "the UK press is very bigoted."
The company pooled mainstream media mentions from news, data mining platform LexisNexis and broadcast, as well as digital platforms including Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, blogs, videos, online forums and more.
Of the total, 12,540 mentions of Harry and Meghan were identifiably from the U.K. and 34,997 mentions were American, although some social media posts are not possible to geo track.
The month was dominated by two main stories about the couple, the first of which was their inclusion in the Time100 most influential people list and a joint cover shoot, when there was a spike of 13,000 on September 15…
Harry and Meghan Covered More Positively in U.K. Media Than U.S. Last Month
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were covered more positively in Britain than America in September despite leaving the U.K. to escape negativity, according to research for Newsweek.
So, not content with thrilling us with the news some unemployed actor walks the dog they haven’t killed off yet, SS seeks to scintillate us further with news about the news about this revered couple?
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Covered More Positively in U.K. Media Than U.S. Last Month
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle got a greater percentage of positive coverage in British mainstream media than American in September, according to analysis for Newsweek by a data intelligence agency.
British mainstream media outlets from print to broadcast delivered 50 percent positive coverage, 16 percent neutral and 33 percent negative over the course of the month, research by Zignal Labs suggests.
Reporting by American mainstream media outlets was 44 percent positive, 28 percent neutral and 28 percent negative.
The mainstream media was more positive than social media in both countries, according to the research.
It comes after Prince Harry told Oprah Winfrey in March the couple left Britain in part because of racism, adding that "the UK press is very bigoted."
The company pooled mainstream media mentions from news, data mining platform LexisNexis and broadcast, as well as digital platforms including Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, blogs, videos, online forums and more.
Of the total, 12,540 mentions of Harry and Meghan were identifiably from the U.K. and 34,997 mentions were American, although some social media posts are not possible to geo track.
The month was dominated by two main stories about the couple, the first of which was their inclusion in the Time100 most influential people list and a joint cover shoot, when there was a spike of 13,000 on September 15…
Harry and Meghan Covered More Positively in U.K. Media Than U.S. Last Month
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were covered more positively in Britain than America in September despite leaving the U.K. to escape negativity, according to research for Newsweek.
Omnipotence
The person who said it and the entire conversation are probably figments of their greedy imagination, created for shock value for the OW interview, along with Methane's suicidal thoughts which could never have existed because that wacko loves herself more than anything and anyone.
Because maybe it didn't really happen. Remember, recollections may vary.
I don't disagree with you, but there are many who would view that as a racist comment under any circumstances, coming from someone with "white privilege".
Grandeur. As in delusions of...
But they've been super busy lately!
