A Amagoodkid O.G. Jan 24, 2007 214 0 Jul 2, 2009 #1 Jul 2, 2009 #1 http://egotastic.com/image?path=0906/cheryl-tweedy-cole-see-through-09.jpg&info=Cheryl%20Tweedy%20Cole%20See%20Through%20Pictures
http://egotastic.com/image?path=0906/cheryl-tweedy-cole-see-through-09.jpg&info=Cheryl%20Tweedy%20Cole%20See%20Through%20Pictures
C CHANEL57 CHANEL57 O.G. Dec 13, 2008 157 2 Jul 2, 2009 #2 Jul 2, 2009 #2 It is Alexander Mcqueen, its about £4000 odd pounds.
Juicy O.G. Feb 26, 2006 1,412 5 Jul 2, 2009 #6 Jul 2, 2009 #6 Personally i think it's hideous! She is normally so beautiful and stylish! £4k on that?! Bad choice Cheryl!!
Personally i think it's hideous! She is normally so beautiful and stylish! £4k on that?! Bad choice Cheryl!!
H_addict H is for HAPPY O.G. Jan 29, 2006 23,032 178 Jul 2, 2009 #7 Jul 2, 2009 #7 Hold on a minute ... are those HER boobs or is it a print on a dress?!
L lil miss cheeky O.G. Aug 19, 2006 733 0 Jul 2, 2009 #8 Jul 2, 2009 #8 her boobs i think. I think its nasty dress doesn't do her any favors and she so pretty
ohgirlll O.G. Jan 5, 2009 317 0 Jul 3, 2009 #9 Jul 3, 2009 #9 H_addict said: Hold on a minute ... are those HER boobs or is it a print on a dress?! Click to expand... LOL! I know right?
H_addict said: Hold on a minute ... are those HER boobs or is it a print on a dress?! Click to expand... LOL! I know right?
E ebonyone O.G. Jun 17, 2007 1,842 65 Jul 3, 2009 #10 Jul 3, 2009 #10 That dress is just ugly and tasteless for over 5000 she could have chosen something much better. In a picture I saw one of the strings on the bottom had broken.
That dress is just ugly and tasteless for over 5000 she could have chosen something much better. In a picture I saw one of the strings on the bottom had broken.
Sammyjoe O.G. Apr 19, 2007 8,689 143 Jul 3, 2009 #11 Jul 3, 2009 #11 I have to agree ,she is normally so on point, this dress had potential to be much much nicer, shame.