Perez Hilton sued for copyright infringement!

  1. Sign up to become a TPF member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It's free and quick to sign up, so join the discussion right now!
    Dismiss Notice
Our PurseForum community is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker. Thank you!
  1. Paparazzi agency sues blogger Perez Hilton, alleging copyright infringement

    Sun Dec 17, 11:13 AM EST

    LOS ANGELES (AP) - Celebrity blogger Perez Hilton is being stalked by paparazzi - in court, at least.
    X17 Inc., a Los Angeles photo agency known for its images of stars in personal or embarrassing moments, has filed a US$7.6-million federal copyright infringement lawsuit against Hilton.
    Hilton's Los Angeles-based site,, posts tabloid photos of celebs and adds cheeky captions and rudimentary doodles.
    The suit claims Hilton used 51 photographs without permission, payment or credit, including images of a pregnant Katie Holmes, Kevin Federline pumping gas and Britney Spears showing her, um, assets.
    "We've had trouble with a lot of bloggers," X17 co-owner Brandy Navarre told the Los Angeles Times for a story on its website. "But he's the biggest, and the most arrogant and pigheaded about it, frankly.
    "He is stealing our images and costing us money every day," she said.
    Hilton, whose real name is Mario Lavandeira, said he believes he has done nothing illegal.
    "I am going to vigorously defend myself," he said. "I am willing to step up to the plate and fight for my rights and fight for the rights of all bloggers."
    His lawyer, Bryan Freedman, said Hilton has a legal right to make satirical or humorous use of newsworthy photographs.
    If the copyright lawsuit succeeds, "the effect would be to eliminate the ability to comment on and transform photographs under the fair-use exception to the Copyright Act," Freedman said.
    But X17's lawyer, John Tehranian, argued that Hilton "is basically free-riding on the labour and efforts of X17 and its photographers who stay up all night and roam the city."
    Seven other photo agencies sent Hilton a joint letter demanding that he stop using their photographs but they have not sued, the Times said.
  2. He's right. And enforcement of such a prohibition would certainly be a terrific opportunity for generation of revenue in a particular sector, but would also present the intriguing question of who would pay the bill...
  3. Wow. This is all bound to happen at some point and time. I am not in law so I can not really comment, but it was all bound to happen.
  4. I don't like the paparazzi but as a viewer of celebrity blog sites, i have cut down on my consumption of tabloids!! They do the dirty work and their paychecks and efforts are being cut. We'll see what happens.
  5. Wow
  6. Just wondering...who pays for the photos of celebs posted in this forum? I see alot of photos "borrowed" from other websites too, is that legal? Or do Vlad and the other mods pay for some of the pics posted here? I don't want to see this forum get into trouble because I'm totally addicted to tpf!
  7. :confused1:
  8. I would think it would fall under satire, no?