Pave love ring medium vs large

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

M

micha67

Member
Feb 3, 2021
20
100
#1
Hi! I’m wondering if people can post pictures and/or share thoughts about the two larger widths of the pave love rings. The thinnest one is too thin for me to wear alone. I’m leaning towards the larger one for my middle finger. Do you think this size ring is too bulky for a daily wear ring for a woman?

From what I’ve read on here, the medium size comes in different widths based on the size ordered. Does anyone have pics of those differences?

Thank you so much!
 
#2
Hi! I wear the pave love ring daily. It’s definitely not too much for daily wear.

The width difference starts at size 52. I don’t have a photo but when you try it on, it is definitely about 1-2 mm thinner. I thought the diamonds stood out more on the 53 so I went with a 53 and then sized it down to a 52. They just add 1 mm to the inner circumference of the ring and re-engrave it so it looks as if nothing was done. It took about 2 weeks and it was complimentary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: planetcopacabana, vivaciousbev1 and nicole0612
#3
micha67 said:
Hi! I’m wondering if people can post pictures and/or share thoughts about the two larger widths of the pave love rings. The thinnest one is too thin for me to wear alone. I’m leaning towards the larger one for my middle finger. Do you think this size ring is too bulky for a daily wear ring for a woman?

From what I’ve read on here, the medium size comes in different widths based on the size ordered. Does anyone have pics of those differences?

Thank you so much!
Click to expand...
I read somewhere on the forum the large was uncomfortable to wear. Def go and try if you can. I think more people own the medium
 
#4
vivaciousbev1 said:
I read somewhere on the forum the large was uncomfortable to wear. Def go and try if you can. I think more people own the medium
Click to expand...
I have the larger one in rose gold as my engagement ring. While I do not find it at all uncomfortable, I have developed a callous on my hand right below it. I attribute that to friction from the gym, and also haven't done anything about it. Rounded edges are definitely more comfortable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vivaciousbev1
#5
lovecartier said:
I have the larger one in rose gold as my engagement ring. While I do not find it at all uncomfortable, I have developed a callous on my hand right below it. I attribute that to friction from the gym, and also haven't done anything about it. Rounded edges are definitely more comfortable.
Click to expand...
Do you have the largest one? The medium sized I heard is ok - it’s the large one that feels uncomfortable to some (some people are not comfortable with bigger thicker rings though).
 
#6
#7
There are three sizes for the pave. I have the “wedding band” pave in yellow gold and find it comfortable for 24-7 wear. I don’t have the largest one. The thin one is very thin- I think it looks good stacked but too thin for wearing solo.
 
#11
First I went to the boutique in July to try the pave love ring and. I came back again a few days ago to try it on again and my SA got me two different sizes to compare. I immediately saw the difference between the rings themselves. The one in RG is thinner. The SA told me that this was an updated model they started receiving now. She compared the characteristics of both. Diamonds weight is the same, but gold weight is 1.2 gr less in a newer version.

I have also tried the largest version which is a very substantial piece.

In the past I tried the thinnest pave ring to stack it with my regular plain love but this one was stolen from me (together with JUC and Tiffany ring).

I’m posting the pictures of all 3 (well, already 4 widths).

IMG_3289.jpeg

IMG_3273.jpeg

IMG_0346.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: keodi, Cartier<3 and micha67
#12
ehy210 said:
Hi! I wear the pave love ring daily. It’s definitely not too much for daily wear.

The width difference starts at size 52. I don’t have a photo but when you try it on, it is definitely about 1-2 mm thinner. I thought the diamonds stood out more on the 53 so I went with a 53 and then sized it down to a 52. They just add 1 mm to the inner circumference of the ring and re-engrave it so it looks as if nothing was done. It took about 2 weeks and it was complimentary.
Click to expand...
Hi! Do you mean that size 52+, the ring is thinner? I ask because a few months ago I tried on a 54 in the pave wedding band and thought it was smaller than the display models. I thought my eyes have been playing tricks on me but it could be real? On the website it says the ring is 4-5mm depending on the size ordered but didn’t know what that meant exactly. Thanks for your help :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cartier<3
#13
mrs_jlp said:
Hi! Do you mean that size 52+, the ring is thinner? I ask because a few months ago I tried on a 54 in the pave wedding band and thought it was smaller than the display models. I thought my eyes have been playing tricks on me but it could be real? On the website it says the ring is 4-5mm depending on the size ordered but didn’t know what that meant exactly. Thanks for your help :smile:
Click to expand...
Yes, in the medium size, the widths can vary depending on the size. I tried size 52 and 53. 53 was obviously about 1-2mm thicker than 52. I’m not sure how thick it is compared to 54 or higher though. I didn’t like that the 52 was thinner even though it fit me better as I wanted a more substantial look with the diamonds. So I purchased 53 and sized it down to 52- they’ll add gold to the inside circumference.
 
#14
planetcopacabana said:
First I went to the boutique in July to try the pave love ring and. I came back again a few days ago to try it on again and my SA got me two different sizes to compare. I immediately saw the difference between the rings themselves. The one in RG is thinner. The SA told me that this was an updated model they started receiving now. She compared the characteristics of both. Diamonds weight is the same, but gold weight is 1.2 gr less in a newer version.

I have also tried the largest version which is a very substantial piece.

In the past I tried the thinnest pave ring to stack it with my regular plain love but this one was stolen from me (together with JUC and Tiffany ring).

I’m posting the pictures of all 3 (well, already 4 widths).

View attachment 5850681

View attachment 5850682

View attachment 5850684
Click to expand...
I like that big one on your middle finger. "Go big or go home!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: keodi, nicole0612, janellmarie and 2 others
#15
planetcopacabana said:
First I went to the boutique in July to try the pave love ring and. I came back again a few days ago to try it on again and my SA got me two different sizes to compare. I immediately saw the difference between the rings themselves. The one in RG is thinner. The SA told me that this was an updated model they started receiving now. She compared the characteristics of both. Diamonds weight is the same, but gold weight is 1.2 gr less in a newer version.

I have also tried the largest version which is a very substantial piece.

In the past I tried the thinnest pave ring to stack it with my regular plain love but this one was stolen from me (together with JUC and Tiffany ring).

I’m posting the pictures of all 3 (well, already 4 widths).

View attachment 5850681

View attachment 5850682

View attachment 5850684
Click to expand...
This is interesting! Thank you for the photos. What size is your ring finger? I prefer the thinner wedding band style but my boutique doesn’t have that yet, I only see the thicker one (the one on your index finger) in my size (54).
 
  • Like
Reactions: planetcopacabana
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top