CeeJay said:Well ... I guess I'm going to be the "odd man out" ... I would go with the Balenciaga bag. However, the reason why I'm saying this is because I find the Paddington to be way too heavy!!! After a day's worth of walking around with that puppy on your shoulder (and with all the 'junk' that I stuff my purse with anyhow), you need pain-killers!
That being said, I do hope that Balenciaga gets their act together and goes back to their original leather manufacturer as the leather on the 2005 Fall bags was not the same as before. I must say, the leather on the Chloe bags (I do love my Silverado Tote) is superb! However, I do find that the leather on the Chloe bags mar much easier than on the Balenciaga bags.
Didn't Vogue recently classify the Balenciaga bag in the same 'category' as Hermes Kelly/Birkin, Chanel, etc. - in other words, a "classic"?
CeeJay said:Well ... I guess I'm going to be the "odd man out" ... I would go with the Balenciaga bag. However, the reason why I'm saying this is because I find the Paddington to be way too heavy!!! After a day's worth of walking around with that puppy on your shoulder (and with all the 'junk' that I stuff my purse with anyhow), you need pain-killers!
That being said, I do hope that Balenciaga gets their act together and goes back to their original leather manufacturer as the leather on the 2005 Fall bags was not the same as before. I must say, the leather on the Chloe bags (I do love my Silverado Tote) is superb! However, I do find that the leather on the Chloe bags mar much easier than on the Balenciaga bags.
Didn't Vogue recently classify the Balenciaga bag in the same 'category' as Hermes Kelly/Birkin, Chanel, etc. - in other words, a "classic"?
Issmom said:I think if its a question of which you buy FIRST, then you go with Paddington. I think that Balenciagas are, in general, easier to find at any time (not easy, just easier). If you have a shot at getting a Paddington, don't pass it up. That color might not be locate-able next month if you do the Balenciaga now.
wellow said:I know what u mean.. I passed the "new black" greyish paddington a month ago.. and I want it now!!!.. But the thing is my great great SA can give me a chocolate brown paddington... without me special order it. But I don't think it's the color that I want.. BUT then again, I don't want to regret it, and I do not want a light color.. as I am so anal about my white spy and I've learnt my lesson! I have the bag until wednesday now. As of this minute, I am leaning towards getting the brown paddington Also, I cannot and will not get the whiskey as I'm getting the honey spy next week.
This is a picture of the brown paddy I've taken from the other forum.
What do you guys think about the chocolate brown paddy? Yummy enough? I want the light blue color.. but I think getting the chocolate will be a good investment as it will never going to get dirty hehehe... I mean it will but it will not show it...
Greendrv said:Balenciaga, the paddy is so heavy and the hardware has been known to chip and peel.
amanda said:i think i've decided on the pewter medium balenciaga. as soon as i saw it, i stopped lusting after the paddington, and anyone that reads this board regularly knows how much i've been lusting after the paddington.
the trend really isn't important to me, it's not like anyone here is going to know what either one is anyway. the balenciaga fits my style better, i think, plus i found a great one on ebay for $600 less than the paddington. and the paddington is white, meaning that it'll probably get dirty...yeah, i'm definately thinking balenciaga.
and whoever said that 'balenciaga' is a great word is right! i love it! best name for a brand that there is.