I dont think there a no no there just not the same kind of style as loubies are. I find lv's are more classic shoes and cls are more exotic and unique. Also the sole is more recognizable ten lv's are and some people like it to be known that there shoes are expensive kwim?I asked this question in the LV thread and so far there was no response. Lol
Are LV shoes a no-no when compared to CL shoes?
Wow. Being that LV is such a hot designer I would of never thought that their shoes would of been considered classic. I guess when I think about classic I think simple. LV shoes cost just as much as some CL shoes and since their bags are a must I wondered if they could compete with CL in th shoe department.CL is the holly grail of shoes while LV is a more classic brand of shoes.
if it's what you like...why would it be a don't? i don't think they'd have as many options thoughI see most people would go with CL for the bulk of their shoes and I would too. I was just wondering if a gal went from wearing CL shoes to LV - would it be a major don't fashion wise...