Okay, I want to start by saying that I really am not trying to discuss the guilt or innocence of OJ Simpson. What I want to discuss is the recent article in Newsweek about his book. I was confused on a few things and was hoping for some clarification. Did anyone else read the article?
I was confused as to why OJ is listed as having described himself as murdering Ron and Nicole in one chapter, but then at the end of the chapter he said he didn't do it. Is that what was really being said or did I misunderstand something?
On another note, the article also stated that the attorney for the Goldman's plans to try and get the copyright from OJ if the book is to be published. Then the Goldman's may or may not have it published I guess to satisfy the $33million judgment against OJ. I would have to wonder though if they would really publish it. I hope not.
Excuse the typo in the title of the thread please.
I was confused as to why OJ is listed as having described himself as murdering Ron and Nicole in one chapter, but then at the end of the chapter he said he didn't do it. Is that what was really being said or did I misunderstand something?
On another note, the article also stated that the attorney for the Goldman's plans to try and get the copyright from OJ if the book is to be published. Then the Goldman's may or may not have it published I guess to satisfy the $33million judgment against OJ. I would have to wonder though if they would really publish it. I hope not.
Excuse the typo in the title of the thread please.