London Olympic logo triggers debate

  1. The Nordstrom Anniversary Sale 2019 Early Access ends today! Please support TPF by using this link before shopping the sale. We're also giving away seven more $200 gift cards during the duration of the NAS! Find out more...
    Dismiss Notice
Our PurseForum community is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker. Thank you!
  1. London Olympic logo triggers debate


    Mon Jun 4, 11:56 AM

    LONDON (AFP) - The "iconic" logo for the 2012 London Olympics was unveiled here on Monday, but critics immediately condemned it as "hideous" and a waste of money.

    The jagged emblem, designed to define the image of the Games in five years' time, comes in a series of bright shades of pink, blue, green and orange, and includes the signature five Olympic rings emblazoned onto the "0".

    "This is the vision at the very heart of our brand," said London 2012 organising committee chief Sebastian Coe, the former 800m and 1,500m world record holder who won gold in the 1,500 metres at the 1980 and 1984 Olympics.

    "It will define the venues we build and the Games we hold, and act as a reminder of our promise to use the Olympic spirit to inspire everyone and reach out to young people around the world," he said at the London launch.

    Organisers hope the logo, designed to be instantly recognisable worldwide, will help boost its campaign to raise two billion pounds (three billion euros) to stage the Games.

    "This is an iconic brand that sums up what London 2012 is all about -- an inclusive, welcoming and diverse Games that involves the whole country," said Olympics minister Tessa Jowell.

    But critics were not impressed.

    Bob Neill, 2012 Olympics spokesman for the main opposition Conservative Party, was disparaging about Coe's optimism, despite him being a fellow Tory lawmaker.

    "Lord Coe has described this logo as 'ambitious, interactive and youth-friendly'. I would describe it as hideous," he said.

    "Questions need be answered as to how we have ended up in this situation. Was there an open competition to supply the designs? If so, what on earth do the rejected ones look like!

    "We need to know how much money this exercise has cost, because whatever it was, it's been a complete waste of money."

    Initial public reaction was also less than positive.

    "This logo makes me embarrassed to be English," said a contributor called Clumbers on one online message site devoted to the logo, which was devoid of supporters of the chosen design.

    "It looks like it could have been done by a six year old. I could do better with my eyes closed," added someone called Bige.

    A poll by the BBC News website asked readers to give it a gold, silver or bronze medal, or a wooden spoon if they really didn't like it. Eighty three percent gave it a wooden spoon.

    The budget for the 2012 Olympics has soared to 9.3 billion pounds (18.6 billion dollars, 13.7 billion euros), nearly four times more than the first projections of how much it would cost to stage the Games in London.

  2. As a graphic designer, I'd say this logo could be more polished given the type of event this is for. It's an international event and should reflect that. It makes me think back to 80's for some reason. Just my $.02!
  3. Ouch! That's an awful looking logo... who will buy anything with that robot-looking thing on it? I'm not a marketing person, but I agree with everyone and think that logo will not work.
  4. I find the logo incredibly disappointing, the London olympics is a pretty big deal and the logo doesnt represent that at all. It doesnt look special or different, or particulary unique. I dont really like it. Someone commented in one of the papers that they thought it looked like Lisa Simpson doing something dirty, and i couldnt quite figure it out until now..and unfortunately i see what that person was refering to. . . :tdown:
  5. I work in Graphics and Advertising and I don't like it either, and as for the £400k they paid for it :cursing:

    The BBC has been running an alternative logo collection where people send theirs in, this is one and I love this one.

  6. Maybe I am missing something, but I don't get it.:confused1:

    I don't see anything appealing/interesting about it whatsoever.:nogood:
  7. it's :throwup:

    someone said to me that if you squint it looks like someone receiving oral sex and that's all i see now :wtf: :shame:
  8. That logo is an utter embarassment! I don't know why we always screw these things up so royally :cursing:
  9. that is absolute rubbish once again I'm ashamed to be British
  10. ^^^ :yes::hrmm:
  11. hahaha!! I see it now!
  12. I really like the logo Ilovemybug posted, its so much better!

    I also heard on the news that the ads are going to be pulled because they can cause people to have an epyleptic (sp?) fit.
  13. ^^ Yep! Just to add more shame to this shambles!!

  14. That one is sooo much better! They should recant the ugly one, and go with this one.
  15. OMG it's horrible! My first time to London will be for the Olympics. I'd hate all my memorabilia to have that on it.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice