interestingThey were cute and I really do like the look, but I have other bags that are both sizes already that are better quality. I can say this for them:
The regular size Regan is bigger than I regularly need (but that's personal preference). Mine was the distressed leather and the leather quality was kind of bad on it. It was OK to look at, but you could tell by feeling it how thin it was. I bought mine on line so I couldn't check this before I got it. I use the shoulder straps on purses and I felt this one was very skinny for this size bag, as well at the attachments sewn on the side of the bag are very small. I was worried over time they would start to rip. But if you just use it as a satchel, that won't be a problem. It is a light bag though for the size and I really liked the whipstitch detail on the handles that are not on the micro. The front pocket on this bag also seemed kind of useless. My phone didn't even fit.
The micro Reagan I actually would recommend for a small crossbody. It fits a lot, more than a mini mac. I've been going back and forth about getting rid of it, and my main reason (if I go through with it) is that I have too much purse overlap in styles. The micro Regan has the same size strap and connectors as the large size, but it works on this size bag. Mine is also the distressed leather, but the quality on this one is way better than on the large size I received, proving it can be hit or miss with RM bags. The front pocket is rather useless on this one as well, but I can accept that more on such a small bag. It will fit things that are credit card sized, which is handy.
Sorry if that was long winded! Hope it's helpful.
I find most of the new RM bags don't have leather that's special
I saw one yesterday at a consignment store - I think it was morning after mini mini or something - small shoulder bag. That one had nice leather - almost like lamb. Of course it was an older bag