Hello,
I have posted other threads about engagement rings in the the past. I have kind of been all over the map, but have finally decided that I want a Tiffany Classic Solitaire. The SA did a search and these are the three rings that are most suitable for our budget. Can you please help me with which is best, if any?
0.80 carat I VS1. Excellent/very good/excellent. Total depth percentage 62.7%, table size percentage 55%, crown height precentage 15.7%, crown angle 34.7 degrees, star length percentage 55%, pavilion depth percentage 43.7%, pavilion angle 41.2 degrees, lower half length percentage 75%, medium to slightly thick girdle thickness, bruted girdle finish, cutlet none.
0.86 carat I SI1. Excellent/very good/excellent. Total depth percentage 62.6%, table size percentage 56%, crown height precentage 15.3%, crown angle 34.8 degrees, star length percentage 55%, pavilion depth percentage 43.7%, pavilion angle 41.1 degrees, lower half length percentage 75%, medium to slightly thick girdle thickness, faceted girdle finish, cutlet none.
0.87 carat I SI1. Excellent/excellent/excellent. Total depth percentage 62%, table size percentage 59%, crown height precentage 14.8%, crown angle 35.4 degrees, star length percentage 50%, pavilion depth percentage 43.6%, pavilion angle 41.1 degrees, lower half length percentage 80%, medium to slightly thick girdle thickness, bruted girdle finish, cutlet none.
They are all within a few hundred of each other in price, so price isn't really a factor, but the first one is the most expensive and the middle one is the least expensive.
I did input them into HCA and the scores aren't that great...how important is the HCA score?
I have posted other threads about engagement rings in the the past. I have kind of been all over the map, but have finally decided that I want a Tiffany Classic Solitaire. The SA did a search and these are the three rings that are most suitable for our budget. Can you please help me with which is best, if any?
0.80 carat I VS1. Excellent/very good/excellent. Total depth percentage 62.7%, table size percentage 55%, crown height precentage 15.7%, crown angle 34.7 degrees, star length percentage 55%, pavilion depth percentage 43.7%, pavilion angle 41.2 degrees, lower half length percentage 75%, medium to slightly thick girdle thickness, bruted girdle finish, cutlet none.
0.86 carat I SI1. Excellent/very good/excellent. Total depth percentage 62.6%, table size percentage 56%, crown height precentage 15.3%, crown angle 34.8 degrees, star length percentage 55%, pavilion depth percentage 43.7%, pavilion angle 41.1 degrees, lower half length percentage 75%, medium to slightly thick girdle thickness, faceted girdle finish, cutlet none.
0.87 carat I SI1. Excellent/excellent/excellent. Total depth percentage 62%, table size percentage 59%, crown height precentage 14.8%, crown angle 35.4 degrees, star length percentage 50%, pavilion depth percentage 43.6%, pavilion angle 41.1 degrees, lower half length percentage 80%, medium to slightly thick girdle thickness, bruted girdle finish, cutlet none.
They are all within a few hundred of each other in price, so price isn't really a factor, but the first one is the most expensive and the middle one is the least expensive.
I did input them into HCA and the scores aren't that great...how important is the HCA score?