Ok ladies. I don't know how many of you have been following this thread: http://forum.purseblog.com/chanel/the-bag-that-does-not-exist-719232.html but we discovered that Chanel made 2 shades of Burgandy for the 11A Reissue. The 226 size which Saks, Bloomies, NM, etc carried was coded Dark Burgandy 81614. The 227 size (which is the one I bought initally) is coded Burgandy 91320 and seems to have only been carried by BG. It got me curious, and not being able to stand not being able to compare them to see which I liked better, I tracked down a 226 from Saks. LOL.
Now of course one must go. I think I like the 226 better. The shade is darker & richer and I don't have a 226 reissue yet. Here are some comparison shots between the 81614 Dark Burgandy (226) and the 91320 Burgandy (227). Which do you guys like better?
Now of course one must go. I think I like the 226 better. The shade is darker & richer and I don't have a 226 reissue yet. Here are some comparison shots between the 81614 Dark Burgandy (226) and the 91320 Burgandy (227). Which do you guys like better?