...Sucks!
I'm sorry to have to be so blunt, but it's true!
So, I saw a bag I liked on the Harrods website, but when I checked back a few days later they had removed not just the bag, but the entire sale section.
That would be their prerogative, of course, except the website, itself, had said that the sale ended on the 26th and yet, the sale section had been removed almost a week earlier than that.
I thought it was unlikely the bag had sold-out, so I decided to email them via the online form to ask about its availability.
No reply.
Thinking this might be because I was emailing the wrong department, as I had selected 'Harrods Direct' from the drop-down menu (even though I would have thought that, if I had been, it shouldn't really be too much to ask for them to pass the message on?), I re-sent my message to the store itself.
This time, I received a reply saying, yes, they did still have the bag (two of them, in fact) and if they could be of any further assistance not to hesitate to contact them.
Success! Or so I thought...
I then replied to their email, asking what the current sale price was and whether there were any differences between the two bags (I, obviously, didn't want to be sent a dud!).
No reply, again.
So, I thought maybe it was asking too much of them to inspect the bags and tell me whether there were any differences/faults, so I replied to their (one and only) reply, again and asked, assuming the bag was the same price as it had been on the website, whether it would please be possible to reserve it for a few days, as I wanted to transfer some money from a savings account to a current account (I don't like using credit cards for store purchases, especially when I have the cash available).
No reply, yet again.
At this point, as I had only received one reply to my four messages/replies, I assumed they couldn't be receiving my emails; especially as that one reply was to the second message I sent via the website and the last two they hadn't replied to were direct replies from our email account.
So, my partner and I decided to called them today, expecting that they would plead ignorance, but were surprised to be told that they had been reserving the bag for me ever since they had received my last email and that I would have to pay for it by tomorrow (Saturday), otherwise both bags would be shipped off somewhere (sounded like Osterley, I think [but I could well be wrong!]?).
I told them that I had received no reply to my request to hold the bag and their answer was; 'Oh, someone was supposed to email you.' :blink:
No apology, or anything - as though, because someone had been supposed to email me, that made everything alright.
I was left feeling as though it was somehow my fault that they hadn't replied and certainly that it was my fault that I hadn't just assumed they would hold the bag, as per my request and transferred the money, anyway.
I, obviously, didn't want to transfer the money if I didn't need to (say the bag had already been sold, for example) and I was still more than willing to purchase the bag, assuming they had been willing to hold it for a few more (as it turned out) days.
Thing is, had they not wanted to hold it for a few more days, for me, due to wanting to put it back on the sales floor, I would have understood to a certain extent, as even though I wasn't informed that they were holding it, I wouldn't have objected, as much, had the reason for taking it off hold been to give other people a chance to buy it; but to refuse to hold it for me when the alternative was shipping it back to the distributor, or to an off-price retailer, or something, doesn't seem to make any sense, to me?
Surely, selling it to me, even on sale, would be preferable to that?
When we told them we would try to transfer the money anyway (which I realise is totally futile, as it'll take at least 3 working days to clear), as if to add insult to injury, they asked; 'Have you ever had anything shipped from Harrods before?', to which I replied; 'No, only from Selfridges and Harvey Nichols.' (I later remembered that that was incorrect, in a way, as I had on numerous occasions via the catalogue), they said; 'It'll cost £15 to £25.'.
Now, on the Harrods website, the shipping charge is £4.95 standard and £9.95 next day delivery and the highest possible charge is £13.00 for next day Saturday delivery.
All the items on the website are shipped from the store, apparently, so why should I be charged up to £20.00 more, just because the item is no longer listed on the website?
This bag isn't enormous, BTW, it's just a clutch and I've never had to pay more than £10 for shipping from any other London store, ever.
I realise I could give-in and pay for the bag via credit card but, quite frankly, why should I? I'm not even sure that I should buy anything from them, ever again, after this debacle.
For such a supposedly 'prestigious' store, I am extremely disappointed with Harrods' 'service' and if you can possibly avoid them and go with another store like Selfridges, Harvey Nichols, or Liberty, instead, quite frankly, I would.
Sorry for the looooong vent.
I'm sorry to have to be so blunt, but it's true!
So, I saw a bag I liked on the Harrods website, but when I checked back a few days later they had removed not just the bag, but the entire sale section.
That would be their prerogative, of course, except the website, itself, had said that the sale ended on the 26th and yet, the sale section had been removed almost a week earlier than that.
I thought it was unlikely the bag had sold-out, so I decided to email them via the online form to ask about its availability.
No reply.
Thinking this might be because I was emailing the wrong department, as I had selected 'Harrods Direct' from the drop-down menu (even though I would have thought that, if I had been, it shouldn't really be too much to ask for them to pass the message on?), I re-sent my message to the store itself.
This time, I received a reply saying, yes, they did still have the bag (two of them, in fact) and if they could be of any further assistance not to hesitate to contact them.
Success! Or so I thought...
I then replied to their email, asking what the current sale price was and whether there were any differences between the two bags (I, obviously, didn't want to be sent a dud!).
No reply, again.
So, I thought maybe it was asking too much of them to inspect the bags and tell me whether there were any differences/faults, so I replied to their (one and only) reply, again and asked, assuming the bag was the same price as it had been on the website, whether it would please be possible to reserve it for a few days, as I wanted to transfer some money from a savings account to a current account (I don't like using credit cards for store purchases, especially when I have the cash available).
No reply, yet again.
At this point, as I had only received one reply to my four messages/replies, I assumed they couldn't be receiving my emails; especially as that one reply was to the second message I sent via the website and the last two they hadn't replied to were direct replies from our email account.
So, my partner and I decided to called them today, expecting that they would plead ignorance, but were surprised to be told that they had been reserving the bag for me ever since they had received my last email and that I would have to pay for it by tomorrow (Saturday), otherwise both bags would be shipped off somewhere (sounded like Osterley, I think [but I could well be wrong!]?).
I told them that I had received no reply to my request to hold the bag and their answer was; 'Oh, someone was supposed to email you.' :blink:
No apology, or anything - as though, because someone had been supposed to email me, that made everything alright.
I was left feeling as though it was somehow my fault that they hadn't replied and certainly that it was my fault that I hadn't just assumed they would hold the bag, as per my request and transferred the money, anyway.
I, obviously, didn't want to transfer the money if I didn't need to (say the bag had already been sold, for example) and I was still more than willing to purchase the bag, assuming they had been willing to hold it for a few more (as it turned out) days.
Thing is, had they not wanted to hold it for a few more days, for me, due to wanting to put it back on the sales floor, I would have understood to a certain extent, as even though I wasn't informed that they were holding it, I wouldn't have objected, as much, had the reason for taking it off hold been to give other people a chance to buy it; but to refuse to hold it for me when the alternative was shipping it back to the distributor, or to an off-price retailer, or something, doesn't seem to make any sense, to me?
Surely, selling it to me, even on sale, would be preferable to that?
When we told them we would try to transfer the money anyway (which I realise is totally futile, as it'll take at least 3 working days to clear), as if to add insult to injury, they asked; 'Have you ever had anything shipped from Harrods before?', to which I replied; 'No, only from Selfridges and Harvey Nichols.' (I later remembered that that was incorrect, in a way, as I had on numerous occasions via the catalogue), they said; 'It'll cost £15 to £25.'.
Now, on the Harrods website, the shipping charge is £4.95 standard and £9.95 next day delivery and the highest possible charge is £13.00 for next day Saturday delivery.
All the items on the website are shipped from the store, apparently, so why should I be charged up to £20.00 more, just because the item is no longer listed on the website?
This bag isn't enormous, BTW, it's just a clutch and I've never had to pay more than £10 for shipping from any other London store, ever.
I realise I could give-in and pay for the bag via credit card but, quite frankly, why should I? I'm not even sure that I should buy anything from them, ever again, after this debacle.
For such a supposedly 'prestigious' store, I am extremely disappointed with Harrods' 'service' and if you can possibly avoid them and go with another store like Selfridges, Harvey Nichols, or Liberty, instead, quite frankly, I would.
Sorry for the looooong vent.
Last edited: