gucci luggage?

#2
haha wow...this is the EXACT question i was asking myself!! I was kind of leaning towards lv, because thats what they are KNOWN for...but then again soooooooo many people have it and massive amount of fakes are making me think that gucci is a better bet

WHAT DO U GUYS THINK???
 
#4
well technically LV luggage is a bit more reliable because the canavs is coated...and unless you get the GucciPlus line (which im not digging at ALL) youd have to be some what careful with ur bag!!! BUT WITH lv U can just wipe it down with a babywipe! :smile:

if it was just on monogram, id probably just go with gucci because its not as out there as the LV is!! but then the thrill of having LV luggae is just wellll mmmm :smile:
 
#8
haha i dont baby things...i know i should and i kick myself later when bags get ruined

but then im like whatever...things are MADE to get worn out and used!!! and to those that travel a lot a cute little duffle like that is the ULTIMATE "bag"!!! i dont know im one of those persons that likes the little bit of zing least expected (like the gucci ice trays i plan to get in vegas haha)

its just FUN!! but i agree LV looks more durable...but gucci is ALSO a lotttttttttt bigger and like a few HUNDRED bucks cheaper....
 
#10
I guess I'm too late, but if it was me I'd choose LV for carry on and Samsonite for check in. LV really is good for luggage, that's what it was made for. Although I like several of their purses, many in the fashion world mock people who wear them because they aren't about purses, they're about luggage. Anyway, for I'd be too scared to check in something that valuable and screams "Steal me" so I'd choose samsonite, they're very well made. If you like a gucci carry on that's fine too (as mentioned its cheaper and has more room or something).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top
Back