I've never owned a pair but noticed a really lovely pair on one of my senior executives recently. 1 day during a meeting, I saw the inside of her shoe and noticed that the SF logo was in a pictoral/blockish lettering rather than a signature. I've always thought it was only a signature so I naturally thought that perhaps the she-boss was wearing a pair of knock-offs -- Oh, ignorance!
But I've been browsing online and noticed that both the logo-ish and the signature-ish ones co-exist.
So I'm wondering if anyone can shed any light on the difference. Is it unique to a certain designs? Unique to a location/time period it was manufactured in (vintage vs newer models)? Limited to special editions only?
Anyone know the story behind this?
[X-posted in Ferragamo]
But I've been browsing online and noticed that both the logo-ish and the signature-ish ones co-exist.
So I'm wondering if anyone can shed any light on the difference. Is it unique to a certain designs? Unique to a location/time period it was manufactured in (vintage vs newer models)? Limited to special editions only?
Anyone know the story behind this?
[X-posted in Ferragamo]