I don't know about everyone else, but if the above messsages were a cut and paste, then I am concerned that the Buyer maybe trying to pull a scam.
Buyer claims to be a physician, but in my experience, her sentence structure, typos and mispelled words send a HUGE red flag. Someone with that level of an education should know the difference between defame/deframe, site/sight etc.....
I doubt that she is a physician and is using this to intimidate the Seller. Further, as someone already had mentioned, will Buyer return the same bag or will they try to send a fake, claiming that is what they received?
I hope Seller took plenty of photos to safeguard herself from a potential scam. GL OP - please keep us posted.
I purchased the bag myself on April 05th, 2010 at Cherry Creek mall, Denver, CO. I was trying to find the phone number to call eBay but I couldn't find it. Can somebody help me find the number that I can call? Thank you
@poopsie2: As I said I bought it at a LV store at Cherry Creek mall, Denver, Colorado. LV store still has my record and I still have the receipt
Also, not to try and start an argument here, but, even if she is indeed a physician, does not necessarily mean that she will use perfect grammar, spelling, and punctuation on a forum. My father is a physician, and I can tell tell you his spelling is nowhere near perfect.
So perhaps we shouldn't all jump to conclusions and bash people for their spelling (although I do agree being a physician has nothing to do with authenticating the bag).
If it's really authentic, post photos in the LV Authenticate This section, and then tell your buyer to deal with Carol Diva to try and prove it is not authentic.
I only quoted two posts above, but OP why do you keep repeating the phrase "Cherry Creek mall, Denver, CO?" That is oddly specific and leads me to believe that something is off here.
Also, why did you disregard the fact that poopsie told you flat out that the pics in your auction are useless from an authentication standpoint due to the fact that they are blurry to the level of being indecipherable?
Furthermore, you have been advised numerous times to request that your buyer procure a letter from Carol Diva. The burden of disproving authenticity is on her. Instead, you have been posting essentially the same thing over and over about how horrific this buyer is and that you've called the police. You could even take the darn thing back and refund your buyer then resell; many sellers have done this. If the bag is authentic as you state, then you could easily resell it again.
For a seller of an authentic bag, I'm sorry but you aren't being very proactive and it makes me doubtful.
I was super angry and said that I'll report her to the police, after I said that, she reported me to eBay! So eBay sent me a message saying that I should try to work things out with her. But I'm not gonna do that with a person like her so I just reported her back and open a case!
Furthermore, she's purporting herself to be a part of a profession that requires years and years of schooling in complicated subjects; I think our assumption that she should therefore be able to spell and communicate professionally (and perhaps even well!) is not unreasonable. I think the reason people are bashing on it so much is that she claims to be a physician well-accustomed to luxury but can't properly spell the brand of the bag. Finally, I think she is using the title to make herself seem "higher and mightier" (for lack of a better phrase) to intimidate the seller in to accepting a return on baseless grounds that she normally would not accept, which I think opens up her sentence structure to critique (personally).
No animosity here...I completely see your point, too. Just participating in discussion.
I'm agreeing with you on this. If i were the buyer I would have already gotten a copy of the receipt and spent the $6 to authenticate with caroldiva. Then there'd be almost no case for the buyer's claims.