Thanks Moe & Valerie! I just got my GD finally! At this point, I've purchased 3 bags in about the span of a few weeks. I think I'll hold off. Plus I think the style may not work for me since I'm short (5'4")!
wickedassin said:Ok, I've got a moratorium on new purses going... BUT I can still look. Anyways, the closest "real" Chanel boutique for me is over an hour away and no one answers at NM's boutique. So I'm hoping someone here can help.
For Spring/Summer 2006, Chanel has what they're describing as a "lambskin totebag with contrasted stitching." It sorta looks like a slouchy bucket bag with a drawstring... Their website is a flash, so I can't attach a photo. If you go to the website, it's the 3rd purse featured in beige under S/S 06...
Has anyone seen this bag in person? I called Chanel and the SA wasn't very helpful. All she could tell me is that it came in a bunch of colors--beige, white, yellow, orange and that there are two sizes--small and large. She couldn't estimate how big the large was. The bag was about $1800... If you've seen this in person, I'd love to get your input. Is it attractive? Does it just look like a boring slouchy hobo with a chain strap? Thanks!
wickedassin said:YES! Moe apparently has a thread on hers... Hers is black. I'm curious if the bag is attractive in person...
boxyandme said:Thanks for the great photos. I've been thinking about this bag after seeing it in the web site. How have you found it it terms of durability. Are you afraid of scratching the leather? I'm torn between this or a LV le talentuex in white, ot even the LV MC petit noe, which is a similar style bag. What do you think? Thanks for your advice!
boxyandme said:I definitely agree about the white interior thing. They definitely weren't being very practical, but like one SA said to me, no one can see the inside of the bag. Did you by chance get to compare the small vs large size, or any other colors?