Cartier YG juc with or without diamonds for everyday stack?

Cartier YG JuC with or without diamonds?

  • JUC regular with diamonds $11,800

    Votes: 33 61.1%
  • JUC regular without diamonds

    Votes: 21 38.9%

  • Total voters
    54

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

myztic

O.G.
Dec 5, 2010
357
171
Hi I’m trying to add to my stack. I currently have a Cartier love bracelet In YG normal size and I wanted to add a JUC. Should I get it with diamonds or without? Which do you prefer for everyday wear? I liked both and can’t decide. The price difference is large but I don’t want to get one and later wish I bought the other. Which would you get?

I’d stack it with the love bracelet and an inch vca bracelet. Sometimes I’d stack it with a love, tennis bracket and vca onyx.

My love is a 16
I was told to take a 15, this is how the 15 fits. Does the size look correct? I also tried a 17 love with a 16 juc and it felt pretty large. I feel like I’m truly an in between size.



C1664858-DA85-41C8-A75C-2CE3BC2103D7.jpeg

F3DB2C1E-2822-40FC-ACA5-13AD80713EA1.jpeg

4D2A3E12-88CD-4108-A17D-7D18D8937596.jpeg
 
Last edited:
With diamonds! I think the diamonds make the JUC and you can wear it casually.
I am between sizes as well and wear a size 17 love. My JUC is size 16.
Does the head of the JUC bother you throughout the day? I am measuring 15.6. I did not keep the LOVE because 16 hit my bone and 17 looks like a bangle. The JUC seems to not hurt the bone in size 15.
 
Does the head of the JUC bother you throughout the day? I am measuring 15.6. I did not keep the LOVE because 16 hit my bone and 17 looks like a bangle. The JUC seems to not hurt the bone in size 15.

Nope not at all. I forget I’m wearing it. My loves I’d honestly prefer half a size smaller (love in size 16 would be too small), but the JUC is the perfect size.
 
I say, JUC with diamonds but in the small/slim size - based on your picture and my preference :angel:
I feel that, with the JUC collection, the designer’s initial idea was “a nail with diamonds”, and then the no-diamonds-version was like a second thought to make the collection accessible to a larger audience.
In the same vein, with the Clash, the initial design (I feel) was without diamonds, and then they thought “ok, now, how do we make it more expensive and add more bling?” (for me, Clash items with diamonds look like an afterthought). With the Love (again, I feel), the initial design was so that the screws were the star of the show, and so both the pavé and the no-diamonds were the initial idea, and then the second thought were the “mid-range” with diamonds in place of 1 or more screws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kveerara
Top