Cartier classic or sm?
- Thread starter Ilovetandco
- Start date
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
100% Classic! I got the sm and was so underwhelmed. You couldn't see the detail of the screws. I went to the boutique and exchanged for the classic and it was SO worth the added cost.
Yup. Def classic. Sm are good to stack with a classic but not great on its own.
Whichever one you want. I have the smal and adore it 
I don’t understand the statement people make saying it’s underwhelming or only looks good stacked and not on its own when the JUC is quite thin, and much of the Tiffany collection is quite thin and dainty. People love the DBTY collection which is much thinner than the small love bracelet 
I don’t understand the statement people make saying it’s underwhelming or only looks good stacked and not on its own when the JUC is quite thin, and much of the Tiffany collection is quite thin and dainty. People love the DBTY collection which is much thinner than the small love bracelet 
Whichever one you want. I have the smal and adore it
+1. I too have the small and love it too. I wear mine on its own 99% of the time which I love but will probably get a couple of other pieces to stack for variety in future. I absolutely love the aesthetic of the classic, but I needed something I could take off every day (I have a job where I’m not allowed to wear jewellery at work) so the small works perfectly for me. I don’t think it’s underwhelming on its own at all, but everyone has differing tastes and that’s why a forum like this can be so useful when making decisions. I say buy what grabs your heart as long as it suits your lifestyle/work and pocket!
I think it depends entirely on the size of your wrists. If you are more petite and have smaller wrists, the Thin is very flattering. Whereas, the Classic is definitely more in-your-face. I love the discreet look of the Thin Loves, but I’ve seen the Classic look beautiful on other people. So try them on!