Would you guys say that a Birkin 30cm is too similar to a HAC 28cm in size? Between a Birkin and a HAC, which would you pick and why? Which one do you find to be dressier?
I wholeheartedly agree with the entire statement above!!!rainrowan said:I find the HAC28 much more dressier in pictures I've seen than the Birkin30...
the HAC also seems trimmer in shape (from front to back), and has a lengthening as well as slimming effect on the wearer.
I think you would love the HAC28, kou. It will fall closer to the look of your Kelly. I *think* the pic here is a 28cm.... source: eBay listing.
tough yes, but how exquisite...koukanamiya said:Thanks Rain and Avan!! I guess I should see if I can get my SA to locate me a fuchsia ostrich HAC 28cm then ... Boy, that's going to be tough
avandome said:tough yes, but how exquisite...
tokyogirl said:I am sure this question has been answered, but are HACs generally more expensive than Birkins?
Kristie.F said:^^ why??
I LOVE gold with fushia HAC! that would be so original and stunning!koukanamiya said:Gold hardware or ruthenium? All my bags have silver hardware, am getting a little bored
they are about 600-1000 more than birkins from what I have seen (7600 +) compared with the 30 cm, about the same (or a tiny more) for the 35cmtokyogirl said:I am sure this question has been answered, but are HACs generally more expensive than Birkins?
avandome said:they are about 600-1000 more than birkins from what I have seen (7600 +) compared with the 30 cm, about the same (or a tiny more) for the 35cm