Some people may have a more knowledge than me on a particular brand's markings. This is what I refer to as a starting point.
I agree. And I've had no issues prior to this where I had concerns. I do in this one instance though as authentications are being made in this instance without necessary pictures and several of the posts were untrue. I realize anyone can give their opinions.
This is the first time in all my years on the forum that I have ever voiced any concerns and the ability to voice those concerns is valid.
It's my opinion that in this one particular instance there is reason for real concern and jewelry authentications should not be undertaken lightly.
So I'll get off my soap box but I won't backpedal. I'm concerned.
It's not an in general concern. I have tremendous respect for our authenticators thought the entire forum.
I'm expressing a concern for the first time and if opinions are valid across the board, the ability to ask for further clarification and express my very real concern is valid as well.
Authentications just can't be undertaken lightly in any thread. And authentications simply cannot be done without large, clear pictures, and many of them.
Glib assessments when people are counting on the answer one way or another, without excellent, heck even remotely decent pictures, is a dangerous precedent, and yes, it concerns me.
The fact that I have never in all these years voiced a concern, and was indeed hesitant to ask for more information, speaks to just how concerned I am.
We ask very very clear and specific pictures when it relates to bags. It should be no different with jewelry. I'd venture to say possibly more important.
Blatant and very good Tiffany fakes abound on the Internet. That in and of itself speaks to the need to be circumspect and cautious about making authentications without necessary pictures.